Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Objective-Conditioned Active Preference Learning for Multi-Objective Alignment

Summary

This paper introduces OGC-DPO, an active preference learning framework that treats each (response pair, objective) combination as a separate query, measures informativeness via the policy's implicit gradient, and selects queries that most expand each objective's gradient coverage, reducing annotation cost for multi-objective alignment. Experiments show OGC-DPO outperforms existing methods under the same annotation cost, and informative conflicts provide useful training signals.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Duc Anh Vu, Thong Nguyen, Hoang Pham, Ponhvoan Srey, Luu Anh Tuan
Objective-Conditioned Active Preference Learning for Multi-Objective Alignment
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Nov 2026]

Title:Objective-Conditioned Active Preference Learning for Multi-Objective Alignment

View a PDF of the paper titled Objective-Conditioned Active Preference Learning for Multi-Objective Alignment, by Duc Anh Vu and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Aligning large language models (LLMs) with several objectives, such as helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty, typically relies on preference judgment for each objective, growing the annotation cost linearly with the number of objectives. Active preference learning can reduce this cost by selecting the comparisons whose labels are expected to change the policy most. Existing remedies either lack an objective-aware query selection mechanism for the multi-objective setting or regard conflicting preferences as harmful, therefore excluding them from the training data. We introduce OGC-DPO (Objective-conditioned Gradient Coverage DPO), an active learning framework that treats each (response pair, objective) combination as a separate query and measures its informativeness through the policy's own implicit gradient, without relying on an external reward model. OGC-DPO then selects the queries that most expand each objective's gradient coverage. Empirical experiments across varying numbers of objectives demonstrate the effectiveness of OGC-DPO over existing active preference learning methods under the same annotation cost. Further analysis demonstrates that informative conflicts, rather than being uniformly harmful, provide a useful policy training signal.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.05506 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2611.05506v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05506

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Duc Anh Vu [view email] [v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 19:04:16 UTC (213 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Objective-Conditioned Active Preference Learning for Multi-Objective Alignment, by Duc Anh Vu and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • OGC-DPO treats each (response pair, objective) combination as a separate query and measures informativeness through the policy's implicit gradient, without an external reward model.
  • The method selects queries that most expand each objective's gradient coverage, effectively reducing annotation cost for multi-objective alignment.
  • Experiments demonstrate OGC-DPO outperforms existing active preference learning methods under the same annotation cost, and informative conflicts, rather than being uniformly harmful, provide a useful policy training signal.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.