Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation

Summary

In computational pathology, nuclear instance segmentation is fundamental but evaluation pipelines have been overlooked. This paper identifies four critical issues and proposes NucEval, a unified framework that handles vague regions, score normalization, overlapping instances, and border uncertainty for more robust evaluation.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Amirreza Mahbod, Ramona Woitek, Jeanne Shen
NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.03144] NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.03144

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

arXiv:2605.03144 (cs)

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation

Authors:Amirreza Mahbod, Ramona Woitek, Jeanne Shen

View a PDF of the paper titled NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation, by Amirreza Mahbod and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:In computational pathology, nuclear instance segmentation is a fundamental task with many downstream clinical applications. With the advent of deep learning, many approaches, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs), have been proposed for this task, along with both machine learning-based and non-machine learning-based pre- and post-processing techniques to further boost performance. However, one fundamental aspect that has received less attention is the evaluation pipeline. In this study, we identify four key issues associated with nuclear instance segmentation evaluation and propose corresponding solutions. Our proposed modifications, namely handling vague regions, score normalization, overlapping instances, and border uncertainty, are integrated into a unified framework called NucEval, which enables robust evaluation of nuclear instance segmentation. We evaluate this pipeline using the NuInsSeg dataset, which provides unique characteristics that make it particularly suitable for this study, as well as two additional external datasets, with three CNN- and ViT-based nuclear instance segmentation models, to demonstrate the impact of these modifications on instance segmentation metrics. The code, along with complete guidelines and illustrative examples, is publicly available at: this https URL.

Comments: 22 pages

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.03144 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.03144v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03144

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Amirreza Mahbod [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 20:33:42 UTC (4,736 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled NucEval: A Robust Evaluation Framework for Nuclear Instance Segmentation, by Amirreza Mahbod and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Identifies four key issues in nuclear instance segmentation evaluation: vague regions, score normalization, overlapping instances, and border uncertainty.
  • Proposes NucEval framework integrating solutions for robust evaluation.
  • Validated on NuInsSeg and two external datasets with CNN and ViT models.
  • Code and guidelines publicly available on GitHub.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.