Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration

Summary

arXiv:2610.00094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Belief-based agent memory needs reliable decisions about current state, yet its evidence may be noisy, copied, or stale. Must a memory calibrate its sources before it can improve its decisions? We separate learning, calibration, and revision certification. On one four-model hidden Markov family, learning an unknown Bayes decision requires Theta(l^-2) records and certifying its improvement over an informative incumbent takes O(l^-2) fresh records from the same observation law, while fixed-precision source estimation requires Theta(l^-4) as persistence l vanishes. Thus learning and certifying useful decisions can require quadratically fewer records than source calibration. A broader model class retains the decision rate and source lower bound.…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Pranav Singh
Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Sep 2026]

Title:Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration

View a PDF of the paper titled Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration, by Pranav Singh

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Belief-based agent memory needs reliable decisions about current state, yet its evidence may be noisy, copied, or stale. Must a memory calibrate its sources before it can improve its decisions? We separate learning, calibration, and revision certification. On one four-model hidden Markov family, learning an unknown Bayes decision requires Theta(l^-2) records and certifying its improvement over an informative incumbent takes O(l^-2) fresh records from the same observation law, while fixed-precision source estimation requires Theta(l^-4) as persistence l vanishes. Thus learning and certifying useful decisions can require quadratically fewer records than source calibration. A broader model class retains the decision rate and source lower bound. Under an unknown identity-plus-background report channel, we characterize the sharp identified interval for policy improvement and derive a finite-sample certificate using observable witness regions, without pure-class anchors. A robustness extension tolerates bounded history-dependent misspecification and conditional copying; split-trained witnesses apply to arbitrary history spaces with explicit power conditions. We integrate policy-bound receipts with Nous Dimensions and test 45,000 held-out mutable-state histories and 9,000 episodes in three external MiniGrid memory environments with an introduced noisy-report interface. The new certificate accepts 9/9 improvements over a constant incumbent and 4/9 over last-write-wins, versus none for the earlier certificate in MiniGrid. Strong established inference baselines remain competitive or better. The result is a statistical account of when memory decisions can be learned and justified without recovering source reliability, not a universally superior memory algorithm.

Comments: 19 pages, 3 figures; code and reproducibility package available at this https URL

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00094 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.00094v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00094

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Pranav Singh [view email] [v1] Tue, 8 Sep 2026 09:01:50 UTC (78 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Nous: Learning and Certifying Memory Decisions Before Source Calibration, by Pranav Singh

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00094v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Belief-based agent memory needs reliable decisions about current state, yet its evidence may be noisy, copied, or stale. Must a mem…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.