Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents

Summary

arXiv:2609.30289v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In team collaboration scenarios, memory is heterogeneous and continually evolving. Team memories capture collective decisions, protocols, and current consensus, while individual memories preserve member-specific observations, execution traces, and intermediate progress. Existing memory-augmented systems typically retrieve from all stored memories as a flat pool, ranking them by semantic relevance, importance, or recency without modeling hierarchical structure or evolving validity. As a result, they often surface semantically relevant but outdated or conflicting memories, especially individual memories that no longer align with current team consensus, instead of prioritizing currently valid memories. This is particularly problematic when coll…

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Yufei Shi, Rujing Yao, Ang Li, Yang Wu, Zhuoren Jiang, Xiaozhong Liu
Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Sep 2026]

Title:Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents, by Yufei Shi and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:In team collaboration scenarios, memory is heterogeneous and continually evolving. Team memories capture collective decisions, protocols, and current consensus, while individual memories preserve member-specific observations, execution traces, and intermediate progress. Existing memory-augmented systems typically retrieve from all stored memories as a flat pool, ranking them by semantic relevance, importance, or recency without modeling hierarchical structure or evolving validity. As a result, they often surface semantically relevant but outdated or conflicting memories, especially individual memories that no longer align with current team consensus, instead of prioritizing currently valid memories. This is particularly problematic when collaborative LLM agents answer user questions, since their responses should be grounded in valid memories. We propose HiCoMER, a framework for hierarchical collaborative memory management and validity-aware retrieval in LLM agents. HiCoMER first maintains the validity of team and individual memories and then retrieves memories that remain valid, rather than retrieving directly from all stored memories. It consists of three components: a Hierarchical Memory Conflict Updater, a Validity-Aware Memory Retriever, and a Memory-Grounded Answer Generator. To evaluate HiCoMER, we construct two new datasets for memory-grounded question answering in collaborative settings. Experiments on both datasets show that HiCoMER consistently outperforms strong baselines by reducing outdated retrieval, preserving current team consensus, and improving downstream QA quality.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.30289 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.30289v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30289

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Yufei Shi [view email] [v1] Wed, 9 Sep 2026 19:40:22 UTC (345 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents, by Yufei Shi and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.30289v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In team collaboration scenarios, memory is heterogeneous and continually evolving. Team memories capture collective decisions, prot…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.