Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity

Summary

Proposes Mixed Integer Goal Programming (MIGP) for personalized meal optimization, using integer variables for practical serving counts and goal programming deviations for soft nutrient constraints, with inverse-target normalization to balance multi-nutrient optimization. In 810 benchmark instances, MIGP finds strictly better solutions than GP with post-hoc rounding in 66% of cases, maintaining 100% feasibility, with solve times under 100 ms. Open-source Python module integrated into an interactive meal planning application.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Francisco Aguilera Moreno
Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.13849] Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity

[Submitted on 12 Mar 2026]

Title:Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity

View a PDF of the paper titled Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity, by Francisco Aguilera Moreno

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Determining what to eat to satisfy nutritional requirements is one of the oldest optimization problems in operations research, yet existing formulations have two persistent limitations: continuous variables produce impractical fractional servings (1.7 eggs, 0.37 bananas), and hard nutrient constraints cause infeasibility when targets conflict. A systematic review of 56 diet optimization papers found that none combine integer programming with goal programming to address both issues. We propose Mixed Integer Goal Programming (MIGP) for personalized meal optimization. The formulation uses integer variables for practical serving counts and goal programming deviations for soft nutrient targets, with inverse-target normalization to balance multi-nutrient optimization. Per-food serving granularity allows natural units (one egg, one tablespoon of oil) without post-hoc rounding. We characterize the integrality gap in the goal programming context and identify a deviation absorption property: GP deviation variables buffer the cost of requiring integer servings, making the gap structurally smaller than in hard-constraint MIP. For meals with 15+ foods, the integer solution matches the continuous optimum in every benchmark instance. A computational evaluation across 810 instances (30 USDA foods, 9 configurations, 3 methods) shows MIGP finds strictly better solutions than GP with post-hoc rounding in 66% of cases (never worse) while maintaining 100% feasibility; hard-constraint IP achieves only 48%. Solve times stay under 100 ms for typical meal sizes using the open-source HiGHS solver. The implementation is available as an open-source Python module integrated into an interactive meal planning application.

Comments: 34 pages, 6 figures, open-source implementation

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

MSC classes: 90C11

ACM classes: G.1.6

Cite as: arXiv:2605.13849 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.13849v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.13849

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Francisco Aguilera Moreno [view email] [v1] Thu, 12 Mar 2026 14:54:47 UTC (79 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Mixed Integer Goal Programming for Personalized Meal Optimization with User-Defined Serving Granularity, by Francisco Aguilera Moreno

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • MIGP combines integer and goal programming to address fractional servings and infeasibility in diet optimization.
  • Integer variables enable natural serving units; goal deviations allow soft nutrient constraints.
  • Matches continuous optimum for meals with 15+ foods; outperforms GP with rounding in 66% of instances.
  • Open-source implementation with sub-100ms solve times for practical use.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.