Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding

Summary

Researchers propose Mistletoe, a stealthy attack that exploits the imperfect approximation between drafter and target models in speculative decoding. By jointly optimizing degradation and semantic-preservation objectives with a null-space projection, the attack substantially reduces the average accepted length and collapses speedup while maintaining output quality.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Shuoyang Sun, Chang Da, Hao Fang, Kuofeng Gao, Xinhao Zhong, Yi Sun, Fan Mo, Shu-Tao Xia, Bin Chen
Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.14005] Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding

[Submitted on 13 May 2026]

Title:Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding

View a PDF of the paper titled Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding, by Shuoyang Sun and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Speculative decoding has become a widely adopted technique for accelerating large language model (LLM) inference by drafting multiple candidate tokens and verifying them with a target model in parallel. Its efficiency, however, critically depends on the average accepted length $\tau$, i.e., how many draft tokens survive each verification step. In this work, we identify a new mechanism-level vulnerability in model-based speculative decoding: the drafter is trained to approximate the target model distribution, but this approximation is inevitably imperfect. Such a drafter-target mismatch creates a hidden attack surface where small perturbations can preserve the target model's visible behavior while substantially reducing draft-token acceptability. We propose Mistletoe, a stealthy acceleration-collapse attack against speculative decoding. Mistletoe directly targets the acceptance mechanism of speculative decoding. It jointly optimizes a degradation objective that decreases drafter-target agreement and a semantic-preservation objective that constrains the target model's output distribution. To resolve the conflict between these objectives, we introduce a null-space projection mechanism, where degradation gradients are projected away from the local semantic-preserving direction, suppressing draft acceptance while minimizing semantic drift. Experiments on various speculative decoding systems show that Mistletoe substantially reduces average accepted length $\tau$, collapses speedup, and lowers averaged token throughput, while preserving output quality and perplexity. Our work highlights that speculative decoding introduces a mechanism-level attack surface beyond existing output robustness, calling for more robust designs of LLM acceleration systems.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.14005 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.14005v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.14005

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Shuoyang Sun [view email] [v1] Wed, 13 May 2026 18:11:42 UTC (1,722 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Mistletoe: Stealthy Acceleration-Collapse Attacks on Speculative Decoding, by Shuoyang Sun and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Speculative decoding accelerates LLM inference via parallel drafting and verification; efficiency depends on average accepted length τ.
  • Mistletoe leverages drafter-target mismatch to reduce draft token acceptability with small perturbations.
  • A null-space projection resolves the conflict between degradation and semantic preservation objectives.
  • Experiments show Mistletoe collapses speedup and throughput while preserving perplexity and output quality.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.