Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

MedJev: Evaluating Zero-Shot System-One Decision Making in Medicine

Summary

MedJev, an open System One model that runs locally on a laptop, is evaluated across ten medical benchmarks, approaching GPT-4 performance on knowledge tasks while exceeding XGBoost on in-hospital mortality prediction but showing miscalibration and weaker operational performance.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Simon A. Lee, Jiahang Sha, Moonseong Jeong, Yunbei Pan, Jeffrey N. Chiang
MedJev: Evaluating Zero-Shot System-One Decision Making in Medicine
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]

Title:MedJev: Evaluating Zero-Shot System-One Decision Making in Medicine

View a PDF of the paper titled MedJev: Evaluating Zero-Shot System-One Decision Making in Medicine, by Simon A. Lee and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:System One decision models such as Jev answer structured questions in a single forward pass without generating text, offering fast and computationally efficient clinical decision support. We evaluate MedJev, an open System One model that runs locally on a laptop, across ten medical benchmarks spanning medical knowledge, diagnosis, and patient level prediction using MIMIC IV and MIMIC IV ED. We compare MedJev against zero shot LLM baselines, published GPT results, and supervised models. MedJev achieves accuracies of 72.5 percent on MedQA, 75.4 percent on USMLE, and 80.1 percent on NEJM, approaching published GPT 4 performance while maintaining well calibrated confidence estimates (ECE 0.028 to 0.063). On patient level tasks, MedJev achieves an AUROC of 0.926 for In Hospital Mortality, exceeding XGBoost (0.902), but underperforms supervised models on operational outcomes such as ED Triage Admission (0.745 vs. 0.809). Patient level predictions also exhibit substantial miscalibration (In Hospital Mortality ECE 0.286). We introduce a lightweight, two parameter recalibration method that adapts predictions to local patient populations using 50 to 200 labeled examples, reducing ECE to 0.007. Our findings establish open System One models as a promising zero shot baseline for medical AI, combining competitive predictive performance with low computational cost and efficient local calibration. We release our code and evaluation harness to support future research.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.36006 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.36006v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36006

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Simon A. Lee [view email] [v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:08:29 UTC (1,559 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled MedJev: Evaluating Zero-Shot System-One Decision Making in Medicine, by Simon A. Lee and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • MedJev achieves 72.5% on MedQA, 75.4% on USMLE, and 80.1% on NEJM, approaching published GPT-4 performance with well-calibrated confidence (ECE 0.028–0.063).
  • On patient-level tasks, MedJev reaches AUROC 0.926 for in-hospital mortality, exceeding XGBoost (0.902), but underperforms supervised models on ED triage admission (0.745 vs. 0.809).
  • Patient-level predictions are substantially miscalibrated (ECE 0.286 for mortality), but a two-parameter recalibration method using 50–200 labeled examples reduces ECE to 0.007.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.