AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

MedCalc-Pro: Solving Complex Medical Calculations with LLM Agents

A new benchmark MedCalc-Pro evaluates LLMs on complex medical calculations involving multiple calculators, nested scales, and fuzzy queries. The authors also propose a generalizable agent framework that outperforms existing models on all three task settings.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Siran Zhao, Ruihui Hou, Ziyue Huai, Chennuo Zhang, Tong Ruan

-->

[Submitted on 3 Jul 2026]

Title:MedCalc-Pro: Solving Complex Medical Calculations with LLM Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled MedCalc-Pro: Solving Complex Medical Calculations with LLM Agents, by Siran Zhao and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Current benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) in medical calculation are largely based on simplified settings, where each patient case corresponds to a single calculator and the required tool is explicitly specified in the query. However, real clinical scenarios often require multiple calculators for joint evaluation, nested-scale calculation, and fuzzy queries that do not directly specify the target calculator. To this end, we propose a new medical calculation benchmark, MedCalc-Pro, which covers three progressively challenging task settings: single-calculator, multi-calculator, and nested-calculator calculation settings. MedCalc-Pro contains 2,268 real-world clinical cases, covering 77 medical calculators across 14 clinical departments. Meanwhile, to address the limited performance of existing frameworks and methods in complex clinical scenarios, we further propose a more generalizable agent framework that supports multi-tool selection and nested-tool calling, while suppressing parameter error propagation through structured validation and evidence review. We conduct systematic comparisons across open-source, closed-source, and medical-specialized LLMs, and the results show that our framework achieves the best performance across all three task settings. This work provides a new benchmark and method for evaluating and applying LLMs in challenging medical calculation scenarios.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.02879 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.02879v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.02879

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ruihui Hou [view email] [v1] Fri, 3 Jul 2026 02:24:26 UTC (443 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled MedCalc-Pro: Solving Complex Medical Calculations with LLM Agents, by Siran Zhao and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)