Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Look Before You Leap: Pre-Action Verification for LLM Agents

Summary

arXiv:2609.11957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM agent acts on the world by emitting actions: shell commands to run, edits to apply. A wrong action does not always fail loudly; it can fail silently, producing a plausible but incorrect effect that raises no error. We argue that a cheap deterministic check, run before an action takes effect, is an effective and underused form of agent oversight, and we study it across two action modalities in one framework. The idea is to fix an action's correct effect by construction, before any executor runs, so that silent failure is measured directly and the verifier may abstain rather than guess. For shell commands, a static verifier over 9930 commands and 482 tools catches 95.8% of invalid commands at a 10.0% false-positive rate. Its syntax and…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Asaad Althoubi
Look Before You Leap: Pre-Action Verification for LLM Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 9 Aug 2026]

Title:Look Before You Leap: Pre-Action Verification for LLM Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Look Before You Leap: Pre-Action Verification for LLM Agents, by Asaad Althoubi

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:An LLM agent acts on the world by emitting actions: shell commands to run, edits to apply. A wrong action does not always fail loudly; it can fail silently, producing a plausible but incorrect effect that raises no error. We argue that a cheap deterministic check, run before an action takes effect, is an effective and underused form of agent oversight, and we study it across two action modalities in one framework. The idea is to fix an action's correct effect by construction, before any executor runs, so that silent failure is measured directly and the verifier may abstain rather than guess. For shell commands, a static verifier over 9930 commands and 482 tools catches 95.8% of invalid commands at a 10.0% false-positive rate. Its syntax and binary checks are oracle-exact, giving zero false positives while catching half of all errors; the flag check is bounded only by help-text coverage and accounts for every false positive. For code edits, a benchmark of 640 edits over 224 files isolating the apply step exposes a sharp split. Content-anchored formats such as search/replace and diff fail cleanly, whereas location-anchored formats fail silently: line numbers corrupt 99.1% of files under a one-line shift, and function-name edits hit the wrong function 12.7% of the time. In both settings a refuse-when-unsure policy turns silent failures into recoverable ones at a tunable cost in applicability: selective grounding reaches 0.958 recall at 7.0% false positives, and an anchor-and-verify applier records one silent misapplication in 8320 trials (0.01%). We release both benchmarks, the verifiers, and the guards.

Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.11957 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.11957v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.11957

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Asaad Althoubi Dr. [view email] [v1] Sun, 9 Aug 2026 20:05:03 UTC (63 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Look Before You Leap: Pre-Action Verification for LLM Agents, by Asaad Althoubi

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.11957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM agent acts on the world by emitting actions: shell commands to run, edits to apply. A wrong action does not always fail loud…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.