Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models

Summary

The paper introduces GATS, which uses LiDAR and radar point projections to select a small fraction of image tokens before the vision backbone runs, cutting end-to-end FLOPs by up to 18x while outperforming the dense baseline on nuScenes and NAVSIM and substantially reducing collision rates.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Zeping Zhang, Zhuoya Zhao, Robert Lagani\`ere
Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]

Title:Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models, by Zeping Zhang and Zhuoya Zhao and Robert Lagani`ere

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Vision-centric autonomous driving models encode thousands of image tokens per frame, yet most depict sky, buildings, or empty road---content irrelevant to planning. Worse, these tokens dilute the planner's attention: we show that randomly discarding 75% of tokens already outperforms the dense model, because the planner can concentrate on the remaining driving-critical content. Building on this finding, we present Geometry-Aware Token Selection (GATS), which uses LiDAR and radar point projections to select a small fraction of image tokens before the vision backbone runs. Because the selector operates on measured 3D geometry rather than visual features, the backbone encodes only the selected patches, cutting end-to-end FLOPs by up to $18\times$. Each kept token receives a 3D anchor from its LiDAR point and is fed to a self-supervised latent world model that predicts future features and 3D displacements without box annotations. At 25% budget, GATS achieves a 3-sec L2 displacement error of 0.520 m on nuScenes and an EPDMS of 88.9 on NAVSIM---surpassing the dense baseline (0.573 m / 85.9) at $6.6\times$ fewer total FLOPs. At an extreme 10% budget (24 GFLOPs, $18\times$ reduction), it still beats the dense baseline on both nuScenes (0.537 m vs. 0.573 m L2) and NAVSIM (87.9 vs. 85.9 EPDMS). On 739 intent-critical scenarios, GATS covers 95.8% of hazardous vehicles and achieves a 0.09% collision rate---73.5% lower than the dense model (0.34%).

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.40935 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.40935v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40935

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zeping Zhang [view email] [v1] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:11:34 UTC (23,400 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models, by Zeping Zhang and Zhuoya Zhao and Robert Lagani`ere

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • Randomly discarding 75% of tokens already outperforms the dense model, showing that many image tokens are irrelevant to planning and dilute attention.
  • GATS selects tokens using measured 3D geometry rather than visual features, letting the backbone encode only selected patches and cutting end-to-end FLOPs by up to 18x.
  • At a 25% budget, GATS surpasses the dense baseline on both nuScenes and NAVSIM with 6.6x fewer total FLOPs.
  • On 739 intent-critical scenarios, GATS covers 95.8% of hazardous vehicles and achieves a 0.09% collision rate, 73.5% lower than the dense model.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Let LiDAR Decide Where to Look: Geometry-Measured Token Selection for Efficient Sparse Latent World Models | AI News Hub