Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs

Summary

Researchers introduce BrailleBench, a 259-image real-world Braille benchmark showing general-purpose VLMs struggle with direct Braille transcription, while a 2B model trained on synthetic data reaches 87% exact match on Grade-1 and 61% on Grade-2, and synthetic validation scores up to 96% collapse to 3.26% on real Grade-1 images.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Kartik Jangra, Atharva Gawane, Siddharth Pulipaka, Hemachandran Karah, Raj Dabre
Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]

Title:Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs, by Kartik Jangra and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Despite rapid progress in visual understanding and document transcription, modern vision-language models (VLMs) struggle with a fundamental accessibility task: reading Braille from images. We introduce BrailleBench, a manually curated benchmark of 259 real-world Grade-1 and Grade-2 Braille images. We evaluate proprietary, open-weight, OCR-specialized, and tool-assisted multimodal systems and find that standalone general-purpose models perform poorly at directly transcribing Braille images, whereas tool-assisted systems perform much better. We design a synthetic Braille generation pipeline with diverse layouts and image perturbations. A 2B VLM model trained on our synthetic data reaches 87% exact match on Grade-1 and 61% on Grade-2 BrailleBench, outperforming standalone VLMs and achieving the highest Grade-2 exact match score among the evaluated systems. We further show that high accuracy on synthetic validation data does not guarantee high accuracy on real photographs in our experiments: models trained on prior synthetic data reach up to 96% on their synthetic validation set but at most 3.26% on Grade-1 BrailleBench. Our results identify an accessibility-relevant capability gap in multimodal systems and show that targeted synthetic supervision can improve real-world Braille transcription.

Comments: 22 pages, 8 figures, 16 tables. Code and data: this https URL

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.36195 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.36195v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36195

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Atharva Gawane [view email] [v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 19:32:41 UTC (5,426 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning to Read Braille: Benchmarking and Improving Braille Recognition Capabilities of VLMs, by Kartik Jangra and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • BrailleBench contains 259 manually curated real-world Grade-1 and Grade-2 Braille images for evaluating VLM transcription.
  • Standalone general-purpose models perform poorly, while tool-assisted multimodal systems do much better.
  • A 2B VLM trained on synthetic Braille data achieves 87% exact match on Grade-1 and 61% on Grade-2 BrailleBench.
  • Models reaching up to 96% on synthetic validation score at most 3.26% on real Grade-1 images, exposing a domain gap.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.