Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Learning from Unreliable Trajectories: Adversarially-Robust Federated Q-Learning

Summary

arXiv:2610.06918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study federated reinforcement learning in which multiple agents interact with a common Markov decision process and communicate through a central server to collaboratively learn the optimal state-action value function. Our goal is to understand whether the sample-efficiency benefits of collaboration can be retained when a fraction of the agents behave adversarially and transmit arbitrarily corrupted information. To address this problem, we introduce Robust Async-Fed-Q, an epoch-based federated learning algorithm that combines variance-reduced estimation of the Bellman optimality operator at the agents with robust aggregation at the server. We establish high-probability finite-time guarantees showing that the proposed method preserves the s…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Sreejeet Maity, Aritra Mitra
Learning from Unreliable Trajectories: Adversarially-Robust Federated Q-Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 2 Oct 2026]

Title:Learning from Unreliable Trajectories: Adversarially-Robust Federated Q-Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning from Unreliable Trajectories: Adversarially-Robust Federated Q-Learning, by Sreejeet Maity and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study federated reinforcement learning in which multiple agents interact with a common Markov decision process and communicate through a central server to collaboratively learn the optimal state-action value function. Our goal is to understand whether the sample-efficiency benefits of collaboration can be retained when a fraction of the agents behave adversarially and transmit arbitrarily corrupted information. To address this problem, we introduce Robust Async-Fed-Q, an epoch-based federated learning algorithm that combines variance-reduced estimation of the Bellman optimality operator at the agents with robust aggregation at the server. We establish high-probability finite-time guarantees showing that the proposed method preserves the statistical gains of collaboration among the honest agents while tolerating adversarial corruption. In particular, the effect of the adversarial agents decreases as the amount of data collected by each honest agent grows and eventually vanishes in the infinite-sample limit. We complement these guarantees with information-theoretic lower bounds that characterize the unavoidable statistical cost of adversarial corruption, leading to the first nearly matching upper and lower bounds for adversarially robust federated reinforcement learning. We further extend our framework to accommodate single-trajectory Markovian sampling and heterogeneous partial coverage, where different agents may explore different regions of the state-action space and learning relies on their collective coverage. Finally, our epoch-based design substantially improves the best known communication complexity for federated Q-learning under asynchronous sampling.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.06918 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.06918v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.06918

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sreejeet Maity [view email] [v1] Fri, 2 Oct 2026 20:54:53 UTC (5,242 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning from Unreliable Trajectories: Adversarially-Robust Federated Q-Learning, by Sreejeet Maity and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.SY eess eess.SY

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.06918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study federated reinforcement learning in which multiple agents interact with a common Markov decision process and communicate t…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.