Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

LaTA: A Drop-in, FERPA-Compliant Local-LLM Autograder for Upper-Division STEM Coursework

Summary

LaTA is an open-source autograder that runs entirely on local hardware, using a LaTeX-native workflow and a four-stage pipeline (ingest, segment, grade, report) with a locally hosted open-weight chain-of-thought LLM (gpt-oss:120b) to grade student assignments. Deployed at Oregon State University for ME 373 with ~200 students, it achieved $0 marginal cost per assignment, a grading error rate of ~0.02-0.04%, and improved exam scores by 11% (midterm) and 8% (final) compared to traditional grading, along with significant gains in student confidence.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Jesse A. Rodr\'iguez
LaTA: A Drop-in, FERPA-Compliant Local-LLM Autograder for Upper-Division STEM Coursework
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.05410] LaTA: A Drop-in, FERPA-Compliant Local-LLM Autograder for Upper-Division STEM Coursework

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.05410

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2605.05410 (cs)

[Submitted on 6 May 2026]

Title:LaTA: A Drop-in, FERPA-Compliant Local-LLM Autograder for Upper-Division STEM Coursework

Authors:Jesse A. Rodríguez

View a PDF of the paper titled LaTA: A Drop-in, FERPA-Compliant Local-LLM Autograder for Upper-Division STEM Coursework, by Jesse A. Rodr\'iguez

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large-language-model (LLM) graders promise to relieve the grading burden of upper-division STEM courses, but most deployments to date send student work to third-party APIs, violating FERPA and exposing institutions to data risk while requiring substantial assignment modification. We present $\textbf{LaTA}\ (\textit{LaTeX Teaching Assistant})$, a drop-in, open-source autograder that runs entirely on commodity on-premises hardware and assumes a LaTeX-native workflow already adopted by many engineering and physics courses. LaTA implements a four-stage pipeline (ingest, segment, grade, report) using a locally hosted open-weight chain-of-thought LLM grader (gpt-oss:120b) that compares student work to an instructor-authored reference solution and applies a YAML rubric with binary per-item scoring. We deployed LaTA in Winter~2026 in ME 373 (Mechanical Engineering Methods) at Oregon State University, grading every weekly assignment for approximately 200 students on a single Mac Studio at \$0 marginal cost per assignment and 1--3 minutes of wall-clock time per submission, enabling regrading of corrected assignments and greatly expanded TA office hour offerings. The instructor-confirmed grading-error rate held at roughly $0.02$--$0.04\%$ per rubric line item across the term. Relative to the same instructor's previous traditionally-graded cohort, the LaTA-graded cohort outperformed by approximately $11\%$ on the midterm exam and $8\%$ on the final exam, and reported large gains in self-assessed confidence on every stated learning objective ($N = 159$ survey responses, $\Delta \geq +1.49$ Likert points, $p

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.HC physics physics.ed-ph

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersIntermediate

Key points

  • LaTA is an open-source autograder that runs entirely on local hardware, avoiding third-party APIs and complying with FERPA.
  • It uses a four-stage pipeline with a locally hosted chain-of-thought LLM (gpt-oss:120b) for grading.
  • Deployed at Oregon State University in ME 373, it processed ~200 students' weekly assignments with an error rate of 0.02-0.04% and led to significant improvements in exam scores and student confidence.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.