Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems

Summary

Researchers present an interactive backdoor attack framework that uses training-data poisoning to implant a trigger-conditioned guidance-policy bias in LLM-based proactive dialogue systems, steering post-trigger multi-turn interactions toward an attacker-specified objective. Experiments in psychological counseling show three attack variants effectively achieve their goals while preserving normal utility, and tested defenses leave substantial residual attack success.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Zhiyang Xia, Yuming Shang, Xi Zhang
Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems

View a PDF of the paper titled Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems, by Zhiyang Xia and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-based proactive dialogue systems provide goal-directed support through sustained interaction. Fine-tuning their underlying models on externally supplied dialogue data introduces backdoor risks. Existing LLM backdoor studies primarily focus on eliciting an attacker-specified response upon trigger activation. We present an interactive backdoor attack framework that uses training-data poisoning to steer post-trigger, multi-turn interactions toward an attacker-specified objective. Poisoned fine-tuning dialogues implant a trigger-conditioned guidance-policy bias that ordinary user utterances can activate, without deployment-time prompt modification or further attacker intervention. Specifically, we instantiate three complementary attacks under progressively expanded post-trigger interaction settings: (1) Direct Attack, which targets an immediate response deviation upon trigger activation, retaining the conventional trigger--response setting; (2) Constrained Progressive Attack, which progressively advances the attack objective along a predefined multi-turn trajectory; and (3) Unconstrained Progressive Attack, which extends target-directed steering to open-ended interactions with varied user continuations. Using psychological counseling as a representative setting, experiments on two LLM backbones and two dialogue datasets show that all three attacks effectively achieve their objectives under their respective interaction settings while largely preserving normal utility. Separate defense evaluations show that the tested training-data filters retain nearly all poisoned dialogues, while three post-admission baselines leave substantial residual attack-specific success.

Comments: 26 pages

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.06969 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2611.06969v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06969

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zhiyang Xia [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:22:44 UTC (2,113 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems, by Zhiyang Xia and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Interactive backdoor attack framework uses training-data poisoning to steer post-trigger multi-turn interactions toward attacker objectives
  • Three attacks instantiated: Direct, Constrained Progressive, and Unconstrained Progressive, covering increasing interaction complexity
  • Experiments on two LLM backbones and two dialogue datasets in psychological counseling show all attacks effective with preserved utility
  • Tested training-data filters and post-admission baselines leave substantial residual attack success

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Interactive Backdoor Attacks in LLM-Based Proactive Dialogue Systems | AI News Hub