Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System

Summary

arXiv:2610.00035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting student performance from educational interaction data requires models that are both accurate and sufficiently transparent to support meaningful intervention, while demographic information introduces an additional risk of unfair predictions. This study investigates a multi-objective framework that combines reinforcement learning-based multiple instance learning (RL-MIL), adversarial debiasing, and preference-conditioned hypernetworks for student-at-risk prediction. MIL represents each student as a bag of weakly labeled interactions, while an RL agent selects informative instances for downstream classification. Two hypernetwork variants are evaluated to determine whether a user-defined preference scalar can continuously control the…

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Bente Hinkenhuis, Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari, Ali Mohammed Mansoor Alsahag
Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 2 Sep 2026]

Title:Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System

View a PDF of the paper titled Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System, by Bente Hinkenhuis and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Predicting student performance from educational interaction data requires models that are both accurate and sufficiently transparent to support meaningful intervention, while demographic information introduces an additional risk of unfair predictions. This study investigates a multi-objective framework that combines reinforcement learning-based multiple instance learning (RL-MIL), adversarial debiasing, and preference-conditioned hypernetworks for student-at-risk prediction. MIL represents each student as a bag of weakly labeled interactions, while an RL agent selects informative instances for downstream classification. Two hypernetwork variants are evaluated to determine whether a user-defined preference scalar can continuously control the trade-off between predictive performance and Equalized Odds. The underlying RL-MIL baseline achieves strong classification performance, but both hypernetwork extensions exhibit mode collapse: changing the preference weight produces little systematic movement along the intended fairness-performance frontier. The failure is associated with objective dominance, weak gradient propagation through the conditioning mechanism, and interactions between dynamically generated parameters. The results show that fairness objectives can be incorporated into an interpretable RL-MIL pipeline, but preference conditioning alone does not guarantee controllable multi-objective behavior. Robust fair RL-MIL therefore requires explicit mechanisms for gradient balancing, objective separation, and stability analysis.

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.00035 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.00035v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00035

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Seyed Sahand Mohammadi Ziabari [view email] [v1] Wed, 2 Sep 2026 17:30:18 UTC (637 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Integrating Fairness and Explainability in a Multiple Instance Reinforcement Learning System, by Bente Hinkenhuis and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.00035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting student performance from educational interaction data requires models that are both accurate and sufficiently transparen…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.