Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

In vivo feasibility study of humanoid robots in surgery

Summary

This study systematically evaluates the feasibility of current humanoid robots for laparoscopic surgical tasks. The researchers developed a humanoid-based teleoperation framework using general-purpose instruments, and assessed its performance through benchtop characterization, dry-lab user studies with surgeons of varying experience, and in vivo porcine studies. The results highlight both the promise and key technical challenges that must be addressed before clinical deployment.

SourcearXiv RoboticsAuthor: Zekai Liang, Nikita Thareja, Peihan Zhang, Calvin Joyce, Soofiyan Atar, Florian Richter, Garth Jacobsen, Shanglei Liu, Ryan Broderick, Michael Yip
In vivo feasibility study of humanoid robots in surgery
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 8 Jul 2026]

Title:In vivo feasibility study of humanoid robots in surgery

View a PDF of the paper titled In vivo feasibility study of humanoid robots in surgery, by Zekai Liang and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Recent advances in actuation, control and learning have rapidly pushed humanoid robots from a distant vision towards near-term real-world deployment. Healthcare is a particularly pressing domain, in which staffing shortages and increasing care demand are widening the gap between clinical workload and available skilled labour. Although current automation has largely focused on digital and logistical tasks, much hospital work remains embodied, requiring mobility, manipulation and safe interaction in human-designed environments. Humanoid form factors offer unique potential, particularly for assisting with surgical tasks. Traditionally, robotic systems for surgery are purpose-built platforms such as Intuitive Surgical's da Vinci Surgical System, and it remains unclear how close current humanoid systems are to meeting the precision, control and safety requirements of minimally invasive surgery. Here we present a systematic evaluation of contemporary humanoid technology for laparoscopic surgical tasks. We develop a humanoid-based laparoscopic teleoperation framework using general-purpose instruments and assess its abilities through benchtop characterization, dry-laboratory user studies spanning diverse surgical experience levels and in vivo porcine studies. Across these evaluations, we quantify technical feasibility, task performance and clinical readiness relative to established surgical platforms. Together, our study provides an evidence-based assessment of current humanoid abilities and limitations for surgical applications, highlighting both their promise and key technical challenges that must be addressed before clinical deployment.

Subjects:

Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.07972 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.07972v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.07972

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Journal reference: Nature (2026)

Related DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10796-x

DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Zekai Liang [view email] [v1] Wed, 8 Jul 2026 22:57:54 UTC (3,468 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled In vivo feasibility study of humanoid robots in surgery, by Zekai Liang and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.RO

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Humanoid robot teleoperation framework for laparoscopic surgery developed
  • In vivo porcine studies demonstrate feasibility
  • Comparison with da Vinci surgical system performed
  • Identified precision and control limitations needing improvement

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.