Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits

Summary

A study using edge attribution patching across six tasks and seven models measures circuit reuse, consistency, and specificity. It finds high within-task reuse and necessity, but circuits lack task-specificity: ablating one task's circuit harms another task's performance as much as its own. Cross-task overlap is substantial, limiting targeted intervention.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Michael Li, Nishant Subramani
How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08348] How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits

[Submitted on 8 May 2026]

Title:How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits

View a PDF of the paper titled How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits, by Michael Li and Nishant Subramani

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The circuits framework in mechanistic interpretability aims to identify causally important sparse subgraphs of model components, typically evaluated by measuring necessity and sufficiency. We measure circuit reuse, the proportion of components shared across per-example circuits within a task, and investigate two less-studied properties of this: consistency, the recurrence of components within a task, and specificity, their uniqueness to a task. Using edge attribution patching across six tasks and seven models, we find that within-task reuse is high and that shared components are necessary for task performance, with ablations causing up to $\sim$100% relative accuracy drops. However, circuits turn out not to be task-specific: ablating one task's circuit damages another task's performance about as much as that task's own circuit does. We discover that this is due to substantial overlap between circuits across tasks, which are causally important for performance. Some circuits do contain a smaller set of task-specific components, but these account for only a modest portion of circuit performance. Overall, our findings suggest that while circuit discovery at the level of attention heads and MLP layers identifies important components, their lack of task-specificity raises questions about the degree to which circuits can support targeted understanding and intervention on model behavior.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08348 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.08348v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08348

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Michael Li [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 18:01:03 UTC (6,056 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How Much Do Circuits Tell Us? Measuring the Consistency and Specificity of Language Model Circuits, by Michael Li and Nishant Subramani

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Circuit reuse within tasks is high and shared components are necessary for performance (ablations cause ~100% accuracy drops).
  • Circuits are not task-specific; ablating a circuit from one task damages another task's performance similarly to its own circuit.
  • Substantial overlap exists between circuits across tasks, with only a small set of task-specific components accounting for modest performance.
  • Findings question whether circuits can support targeted understanding and intervention on model behavior.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.