Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

How Language Models Process Negation

Summary

LLMs have internal components that correctly process negation but often give wrong answers due to late-layer attention shortcuts. Ablating those modules improves accuracy. The models use both suppressive and constructive mechanisms, with the constructive being more prominent.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Zhejian Zhou, Tianyi Zhou, Robin Jia, Jonathan May
How Language Models Process Negation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.03052] How Language Models Process Negation

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.03052

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.03052 (cs)

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:How Language Models Process Negation

Authors:Zhejian Zhou, Tianyi Zhou, Robin Jia, Jonathan May

View a PDF of the paper titled How Language Models Process Negation, by Zhejian Zhou and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We study how Large Language Models (LLMs) process negation mechanistically. First, we establish that even though open-weight models often provide wrong answers to questions involving negation, they do possess internal components that process negation correctly. Their poor accuracy is due to late-layer attention behavior that promotes simple shortcuts; ablating those attention modules greatly improves accuracy on negation-related questions. Second, we uncover how models process negation. We consider two hypotheses: models could use attention heads that attend to the phrase being negated and suppress related concepts, or they could directly construct a representation of the entire negative phrase (e.g., representing "not gas" as a vector that promotes liquids and solids). We apply a range of observational and causal interpretability techniques on Mistral-7B and Llama-3.1-8B to show that models implement both mechanisms, with the "constructive" mechanism being more prominent. Combined, our work deepens the understanding of LLMs' internals, highlighting construction-dominant computations and the coexistence of competing mechanisms within LLMs.

Comments: ICML2026 preprint, camera ready in progress

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.03052 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.03052v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.03052

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zhejian Zhou [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 18:17:05 UTC (513 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How Language Models Process Negation, by Zhejian Zhou and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • LLMs internally process negation correctly despite frequent errors.
  • Late-layer attention shortcuts cause errors; removing them boosts accuracy.
  • Models implement both suppressive and constructive mechanisms, with constructive dominant.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.