Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models

Summary

This study introduces a red-teaming framework to measure the Overton Window (range of political opinions) of open-source LLMs on controversial topics, and quantifies how simple natural-language jailbreaks expand that range. Key findings include a systematic left-leaning bias, inverse relationship between model size and expressivity, significant regional differences, and varying jailbreak potency across model families. The framework aids auditing political steerability and designing countermeasures.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Daniel C. Ruiz, Anna Serbina, Ashwin Rao, Emilio Ferrara, Luca Luceri
How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.22880] How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models

[Submitted on 20 May 2026]

Title:How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models, by Daniel C. Ruiz and 4 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:As large language model (LLM)-based agents increasingly participate in online discourse, red-teaming their capacity to support political influence campaigns is critical for information integrity. In pursuit of this goal, we focus on locally deployed open-source LLMs, as opposed to frontier API-only models, given their superior alignment with the operational constraints of privacy-conscious malicious actors deployed in social media environments. We introduce an empirical red-teaming framework for measuring LLM Overton Windows (OWs), defined as the range of political opinions a model can reliably express on controversial topics, and for quantifying how simple natural-language jailbreaks expand that range. We evaluate more than 30 LLMs spanning 10 model families and five countries of origin. We find systematic asymmetries in political expressivity: open-source LLMs are typically more willing to generate left-leaning social media content, OWs tend to contract inversely to model size, and regional differences are substantial despite uneven representation in the open-source ecosystem. Jailbreak potency also varies sharply across model families, motivating a workflow for identifying effective combinations of jailbreak techniques. Taken together, our results establish a practical framework for auditing the political steerability of open-source LLMs and for helping future researchers design stronger countermeasures against LLM-enabled influence campaigns.

Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures, submitted to COLM 2026

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.22880 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.22880v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22880

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Daniel Ruiz [view email] [v1] Wed, 20 May 2026 19:25:26 UTC (994 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models, by Daniel C. Ruiz and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CY

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Introduces Overton Window concept to measure LLM political expressivity.
  • Open-source LLMs show systematic left-leaning bias in social media content.
  • Larger models have narrower political expression windows.
  • Jailbreak effectiveness varies greatly by model family, requiring tailored combinations.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

How Far Will They Go? Red-Teaming Online Influence with Large Language Models | AI News Hub