Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

How Far Can Coding Agents Go in Visual Generation?

Summary

arXiv:2610.19025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern image generation largely relies on specialized generative models that leave the process of image construction implicit in learned parameters. We explore an alternative: general-purpose coding agents that construct images through executable programs. Our study of zero-shot drawing on AgentDrawBench, a 200-prompt benchmark, reveals a distinctive capability profile. Agents excel at preserving structure and satisfying precise visual constraints, achieving competitive results in domains where compositional accuracy matters more than photorealistic appearance, while remaining limited in perceptual richness. Their visual expressiveness varies with the drawing interface, and a qualitative study on reconstruction shows how procedural skills ex…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Hengguang Zhou, Yuanhao Ban, Jiaqi Feng, Xiaohuan Pei, Justin Cui, Cho-Jui Hsieh
How Far Can Coding Agents Go in Visual Generation?
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 13 Oct 2026]

Title:How Far Can Coding Agents Go in Visual Generation?

View a PDF of the paper titled How Far Can Coding Agents Go in Visual Generation?, by Hengguang Zhou and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern image generation largely relies on specialized generative models that leave the process of image construction implicit in learned parameters. We explore an alternative: general-purpose coding agents that construct images through executable programs. Our study of zero-shot drawing on AgentDrawBench, a 200-prompt benchmark, reveals a distinctive capability profile. Agents excel at preserving structure and satisfying precise visual constraints, achieving competitive results in domains where compositional accuracy matters more than photorealistic appearance, while remaining limited in perceptual richness. Their visual expressiveness varies with the drawing interface, and a qualitative study on reconstruction shows how procedural skills extracted from human demonstrations support different artistic media. We then examine code as an external visual language of thought: a structured, executable representation that agents can construct and inspect. We test it in visual question answering task and find reconstructed visual code retains substantial information for question answering and, in some domains, supports higher accuracy than the original image. These abilities raise a further question: do agents draw on a shared internal representation of scene content beyond a particular drawing program? We explore an internal visual language-of-thought hypothesis, in which a shared, compositionally structured representation supports visual operations across drawing languages. Cross-harness drawings and images assembled from independent single-pixel queries exhibit related layouts and tones. Agents also maintain self-generated room arrangements across viewpoints after visible drawings are removed. These results demonstrate that the coding agent would maintain a consistent and coherent world inside its imagine even before the harness gets involved and the generation starts.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.19025 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.19025v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19025

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hengguang Zhou [view email] [v1] Tue, 13 Oct 2026 18:18:41 UTC (6,216 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled How Far Can Coding Agents Go in Visual Generation?, by Hengguang Zhou and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.19025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern image generation largely relies on specialized generative models that leave the process of image construction implicit in le…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.