Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations

Summary

A new method detects coalition structures in multi-agent AI by analyzing mutual information of hidden states and applying spectral partitioning, validated in RL and LLM settings.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Cameron Berg, Susan L. Schneider, Mark M. Bailey
Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.06696] Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations

View a PDF of the paper titled Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations, by Cameron Berg and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Collections of interacting AI agents can form coalitions, creating emergent group-level organization that is critical for AI safety and alignment. However, observing agent behavior alone is often insufficient to distinguish genuine informational coupling from spurious similarity, as consequential coalitions may form at the level of internal representations before any overt behavioral change is apparent. Here, we introduce a practical method for detecting coalition structure from the internal neural representations of multi-agent systems. The approach constructs a pairwise mutual-information graph from the hidden states of agents and applies spectral partitioning to identify the most salient coalition boundary.

We validate this method in two domains. First, in multi-agent reinforcement learning environments, the method successfully recovers programmed hierarchical and dynamic coalition structures and correctly rejects false positives arising from behavioral coordination without informational coupling. Second, using a large language model, the method identifies coalition structures implied by descriptive prompts, tracks dynamic team reassignments, and reveals a representational hierarchy where explicit labels dominate over conflicting interaction patterns. Across both settings, the recovered partition reveals subgroup organization that a scalar cross-agent mutual-information measure cannot distinguish. The results demonstrate that analyzing hidden-state mutual information through spectral partitioning provides a scalable diagnostic for identifying representational coalitions, offering a valuable tool for monitoring emergent structure in distributed AI systems.

Comments: 18 pages

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

MSC classes: Primary: 68T42, Secondary: 93A16, 68T07, 94A17, 05C50

Cite as: arXiv:2605.06696 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.06696v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06696

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Mark Bailey [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 16:59:08 UTC (1,997 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Hidden Coalitions in Multi-Agent AI: A Spectral Diagnostic from Internal Representations, by Cameron Berg and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.LG cs.MA

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersIntermediate

Key points

  • Proposes coalition detection via spectral partitioning of hidden-state mutual information
  • Successfully recovers programmed hierarchical and dynamic coalitions in MARL
  • Reveals label-dominant representational hierarchy in LLMs
  • Provides a scalable diagnostic for monitoring emergent structure in distributed AI systems

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.