跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.30162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited coverage of reasoning with long chains of thought and tool use, while strong average performance can mask substantial losses in individual expert capabilities. We introduce FusionEval, a benchmark that provides controlled expert pools, integrates fusion methods with and without additional training, and offers a unified evaluation suite. The pools contain domain experts independently trained from Qwen3 and Llama base models across math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. The suite evaluates capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks under compara…

來源arXiv Computational Linguistics作者: Shuo Cai, Yanggan Gu, Yuhang Liu, Su Lu, Yuanyi Wang, Yang Yu, Zhen Li, Zhitian Hou, Guanghao Zhu, Ming Li, Hongxia Yang
待翻譯:FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 30 Sep 2026] Title:FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models View a PDF of the paper titled FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models, by Shuo Cai and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited coverage of reasoning with long chains of thought and tool use, while strong average performance can mask substantial losses in individual expert capabilities. We introduce FusionEval, a benchmark that provides controlled expert pools, integrates fusion methods with and without additional training, and offers a unified evaluation suite. The pools contain domain experts independently trained from Qwen3 and Llama base models across math, code, science, instruction following, and tool use. The suite evaluates capability retention and computational cost on eight public benchmarks under comparable data access rules, reporting normalized average and worst performance, runtime, and peak GPU memory usage. Extensive experiments show that training-free methods preserve reasoning performance but substantially degrade tool use at both model scales. In contrast, MOPD preserves tool use and achieves a more balanced capability profile, but requires additional data preparation, inference, and training. Jointly retaining reasoning, instruction following, and tool use at low computational cost remains a challenge. We hope FusionEval supports future research on efficient model fusion that jointly preserves expert capabilities. Our code is available at this https URL. Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2610.30162 [cs.CL] (or arXiv:2610.30162v1 [cs.CL] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.30162 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Shuo Cai [view email] [v1] Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:10:13 UTC (234 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled FusionEval: Benchmarking Model Fusion for Large Language Models, by Shuo Cai and 10 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CL new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations SciX Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.30162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Model fusion aims to integrate the capabilities of multi-expert models into a single model. Existing evaluations offer limited cove…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。