Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models

Summary

A study on Qwen3.5-27B tool-use tasks across 32 fresh worlds finds that case-specific residual-writing interventions lift familiar target-selection correctness from about 27% to roughly 90%, but these gains vanish when familiar facts and identifiers are recombined in the same task, and they yield little improvement in independent eligibility or selection judgments.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Tianda Sun, Dimitar Kazakov
From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 5 Oct 2026]

Title:From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models

View a PDF of the paper titled From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models, by Tianda Sun and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Activation interventions can make a language model produce a target answer, but can the model use the intended condition in other computations? We study this question in Qwen3.5-27B on tool-use tasks where time or permissions determine eligibility and selection. Across 32 fresh worlds, two case-specific residual-writing variants raise familiar target-selection correctness from 35/128 to 119/128 and from 33/128 to 114/128. Yet these gains disappear when familiar facts and identifiers are recombined within the same selection task, while selection of previously rewarded identifiers increases. The gains persist across output formats but yield little improvement in independent judgments about whether a candidate is eligible or should be selected. Internal edits can nevertheless change how a source fact affects a judgment: in a prespecified secondary comparison, an early-layer source patch changes 50/64 judgments when that source is used, with one adverse change among 64 cases where it is not. This selective effect does not ensure correct complete actions. Together, these results separate target-selection control, condition-sensitive judgments, and complete-action correctness. Evaluating how an edited state is used, rather than only its trained answer, exposes these differences.

Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures. Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31686 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.31686v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31686

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Tianda Sun [view email] [v1] Mon, 5 Oct 2026 11:46:10 UTC (48 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Target Selection to Condition Reuse: Auditing Residual Interventions in Tool-Use Models, by Tianda Sun and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Activation interventions can substantially raise target-selection correctness, but do not guarantee the intended condition is reused in other computations.
  • Gains disappear when familiar facts and identifiers are recombined within the same selection task, while selection of previously rewarded identifiers increases.
  • An early-layer source patch selectively changes 50 of 64 judgments when the source is used, with one adverse change among 64 cases where it is not.
  • The work separates target-selection control, condition-sensitive judgments, and complete-action correctness.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.