Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

From Structural Feedback to Prompt Policies: Learning Faithful Text-to-Image Prompt Editors

Summary

StruPO introduces a structure-aware prompt editor that turns calibrated scene-graph feedback into a reusable editing policy, improving relational fidelity without an iterative critique-rewrite loop.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Wentao Ye, Yali Ye, Zhiqing Xiao, Ru Peng, Xinpeng Ti, Liyao Li, Zhanming Shen, Peng Lu, Jie Zhang, Haobo Wang
From Structural Feedback to Prompt Policies: Learning Faithful Text-to-Image Prompt Editors
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 26 Oct 2026]

Title:From Structural Feedback to Prompt Policies: Learning Faithful Text-to-Image Prompt Editors

View a PDF of the paper titled From Structural Feedback to Prompt Policies: Learning Faithful Text-to-Image Prompt Editors, by Wentao Ye and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Prompt optimization should improve the image a user receives without changing the scene the user requested. Yet stylistic rewriting can weaken object attributes and relations even when global text--image similarity remains high. We propose StruPO, a structure-aware prompt editor that uses a calibrated scene graph as a shared representation for policy conditioning and image-grounded supervision. The graph exposes what should be preserved, while deletion, reordering, and insertion provide a token-aligned way to modify the prompt. This turns structural feedback from an external critique into a training signal for a reusable editing policy. Learning from that signal requires handling both uncertain grounding and stochastic image generation. StruPO retains grounding confidence through smooth reward shaping and averages multiple images for each edit before computing group-relative advantages. Experiments span three disjoint 2K-prompt test sets and four frozen generation backbones, with comparisons to learned prompt optimizers, iterative structural feedback, diffusion-model fine-tuning, and inference-time attention control. StruPO improves the faithfulness--aesthetics trade-off, with consistent gains in relational fidelity. Independent automatic evaluators and a 15-annotator study provide complementary evidence, and human preference margins increase with relation complexity. Controlled ablations connect these gains to graph conditioning, local editing, and image-grounded learning. The resulting policy produces reusable optimized text in one pass after graph calibration, without an iterative critique--rewrite loop.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.36146 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.36146v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36146

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Wentao Ye [view email] [v1] Mon, 26 Oct 2026 18:50:50 UTC (9,030 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled From Structural Feedback to Prompt Policies: Learning Faithful Text-to-Image Prompt Editors, by Wentao Ye and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • StruPO uses a calibrated scene graph as a shared representation for policy conditioning and image-grounded supervision.
  • Token-aligned edits via deletion, reordering, and insertion convert structural feedback into a training signal.
  • Across three 2K-prompt test sets and four frozen backbones, StruPO improves the faithfulness-aesthetics trade-off, with human preference gains growing with relation complexity.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.