AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Explainable Geospatial AI for Satellite Ground Station Siting Using LiDAR-Derived Terrain Intelligence

This paper presents an interpretable, globally deployable machine learning framework for predicting representative clutter height (RCH) from open geospatial data. The model, trained with LiDAR-derived labels and using LightGBM, achieves a mean absolute error of 1.79m and R²=0.765, reducing error by over 60% compared to the ITU baseline. SHAP analysis identifies tree canopy cover, land-cover semantics, and spectral reflectance as key predictors. Accepted at IEEE CASE 2026.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Shohini Sarkar, Smithi Mahendran, Rishi Chudasama, Varun Mannam, Arav Luthra, Yuvraj Rekhi, Vivek Nadig, Arsh Goenka

-->

[Submitted on 19 Jun 2026]

Title:Explainable Geospatial AI for Satellite Ground Station Siting Using LiDAR-Derived Terrain Intelligence

View a PDF of the paper titled Explainable Geospatial AI for Satellite Ground Station Siting Using LiDAR-Derived Terrain Intelligence, by Shohini Sarkar and 7 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Representative clutter height (RCH) is a key parameter in radio propagation and interference analysis because it captures the dominant height of local obstructions that drive terminal clutter loss. Current practice often relies on fixed clutter heights assigned to land use classes in Recommendation ITU-R P.452-18, but this misses within class variation and can lead to conservative exclusion zones and poor site ranking for low Earth orbit ground station siting and spectrum coordination. We present an interpretable, globally deployable machine learning framework for predicting RCH from open geospatial data. The model is trained using LiDAR derived labels from the U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program and inference time features from global land-cover, terrain, demographic, thermal, and optical remote sensing products. We define RCH using a robust 75th percentile clutter height statistic, evaluate multiple regressors, and select LightGBM for its accuracy, efficiency, and compatibility with feature attribution analysis. The final model achieves a mean absolute error of 1.79m and an R^2=0.765, reducing absolute error by more than 60% relative to the ITU baseline. Beyond aggregate fit, we evaluate domain facing criteria relevant to RF planning, including meter scale error, tolerance band accuracy, over and under estimation tails, agreement with ITU clutter height regimes, and SHAP-based physical plausibility. SHAP identifies tree canopy cover, land-cover semantics, and spectral reflectance as the most influential predictors. Studies on segmentation derived features, non-forest ablations, and land-cover matched international validation show that open geospatial data can improve clutter modeling at scale without sacrificing interpretability or deployability.

Comments: Accepted at the 2026 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (IEEE CASE 2026)

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.14127 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.14127v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.14127

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shohini Sarkar [view email] [v1] Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:08:52 UTC (2,927 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Explainable Geospatial AI for Satellite Ground Station Siting Using LiDAR-Derived Terrain Intelligence, by Shohini Sarkar and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.ET

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)