Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Evolving to Match Capabilities: Improving Harness Self-Evolution via Skill Adaptation

Summary

The paper shows that harness skills do not benefit all models equally: skills that boost strong models can hurt weaker ones. It introduces a fixed meta-skill that guides skill reformulation to fit the executor and improves seven models by 2.0-5.1 points inside a five-round self-evolution loop.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Zhihao Yang, Haojin Wang, Juncheng Wu, Kuan Zhang, Yukun Chen, Run Luo, Yaojie Lu, Yuyin Zhou, Lu Wang, Xianpei Han
Evolving to Match Capabilities: Improving Harness Self-Evolution via Skill Adaptation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 10 Oct 2026]

Title:Evolving to Match Capabilities: Improving Harness Self-Evolution via Skill Adaptation

View a PDF of the paper titled Evolving to Match Capabilities: Improving Harness Self-Evolution via Skill Adaptation, by Zhihao Yang and 9 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Harness self-evolution offers a practical route for LLM agents to improve from execution experience without updating model parameters. Its effectiveness depends on whether models can successfully act on the guidance provided by their harnesses. However, we find that harness benefits are not uniform across model capabilities: skills that improve stronger models can provide little benefit or even degrade performance for weaker ones. Across seven models and three benchmarks, we identify 103 task-skill pairs where skills improve GPT-5.6-luna by 31.1 points but degrade Gemma-4-E4B by 8.8 points. In 86% of failed weak-model runs, the violated requirement is already stated in the skill. This motivates skill adaptation: reformulating existing skills to match the executor's capabilities and make their guidance easier to execute. To achieve this, we diagnose failures in tool execution, context management, instruction following, and verification, and distill these diagnoses into a fixed meta-skill that guides adaptation during harness self-evolution. Guided by the meta-skill, a capable external rewriter, Kimi-K3, adapts skills without execution evidence, improving the three weak executors by 5.1-14.1 points over the original skills. We then incorporate this adaptation into a five-round self-evolution loop, where each model revises its own skill from execution trajectories and verifier feedback. Across seven executors, from Gemma-4-E4B to Kimi-K2.5, the meta-skill consistently improves final scores by 2.0-5.1 points over the same loop without the meta-skill. Our findings provide practical design guidance for developing more effective harness self-evolution methods.

Comments: 24 pages, 12 figures, 4 tables. Project page: this https URL

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.33024 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.33024v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33024

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zhihao Yang [view email] [v1] Sat, 10 Oct 2026 04:44:35 UTC (1,621 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evolving to Match Capabilities: Improving Harness Self-Evolution via Skill Adaptation, by Zhihao Yang and 9 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.CL

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Across seven models and three benchmarks, 103 task-skill pairs raise GPT-5.6-luna by 31.1 points but lower Gemma-4-E4B by 8.8 points.
  • In 86% of failed weak-model runs, the violated requirement was already stated in the skill, so the issue is executability rather than missing information.
  • Guided by the meta-skill, Kimi-K3 adapts skills without execution evidence and improves three weak executors by 5.1-14.1 points over the original skills.
  • Embedded in a five-round self-evolution loop, the meta-skill lifts final scores by 2.0-5.1 points for all seven executors from Gemma-4-E4B to Kimi-K2.5.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.