Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

Summary

Compact language models face challenges beyond isolated function calling when using tools. Evoflux uses evolutionary search at inference time to repair executable tool workflows, raising execution feasibility from 3% to 17-24% on MCP-Bench tasks, outperforming SFT and DPO baselines.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Kushal Raj Bhandari, Ling Yue, Ching-Yun Ko, Dhaval Patel, Shaowu Pan, Pin-Yu Chen, Jianxi Gao
Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2606.12674] Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

[Submitted on 10 Jun 2026]

Title:Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents, by Kushal Raj Bhandari and 5 other authors

View PDF

Abstract:Compact language models (LMs) reduce cost, latency, and deployment risk for tool agents. Yet MCP-style tool use requires more than isolated function calling: an agent must discover tools from live catalogs, satisfy schemas, preserve dependencies across intermediate outputs, and ground final responses in executed evidence. Small planners often generate plausible workflow graphs that fail under tool resolution, parameter validation, dependency tracking, or execution. We argue that this failure mode is poorly handled by small-corpus distillation. A few hundred teacher traces can teach workflow format, but rarely cover the recovery behavior needed to repair failed plans over changing tool catalogs. We introduce Evoflux, an inference-time evolutionary search method that treats compact tool use as the repair of executable tool workflows. It evolves typed workflow graphs through structured edits, execution feedback, adaptive intensity, meta-guided redesign, and diversity pruning. On held-out MCP-Bench tasks spanning live MCP servers and 250 tools, Evoflux raises execution feasibility from roughly 3% to 17-24% across small planners. In contrast, SFT and SFT+DPO on the same search-mined data match, underperform, or collapse below zero-shot performance; ReAct reaches higher peaks, but with higher variance and token cost. These results show that execution-grounded search is more reliable under scarce teacher-trace budgets.

Comments: Code is available at this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2606.12674 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2606.12674v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.12674

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Kushal Raj Bhandari [view email] [v1] Wed, 10 Jun 2026 21:01:06 UTC (2,172 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Evoflux: Inference-Time Evolution of Executable Tool Workflows for Compact Agents, by Kushal Raj Bhandari and 5 other authors

View PDF

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-06

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Small language models struggle with tool workflow dependencies and execution.
  • Evoflux evolves typed workflow graphs via structured edits and execution feedback.
  • It improves execution feasibility from 3% to 17-24% across 250 tools.
  • Execution-grounded search is more reliable than teacher-trace distillation.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.