Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics

Summary

Modern AI enables collective decision-making with free-text opinions. Standard embeddings measure semantic similarity, but facility location and fair clustering require preferential similarity—where distance reflects agreement. The paper formalizes this invariance problem and shows that synthetic training data can break the correlation between semantics and preferences, significantly improving preference prediction.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Carter Blair, Ariel D. Procaccia, Milind Tambe
Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08360] Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics

[Submitted on 8 May 2026]

Title:Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics

View a PDF of the paper titled Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics, by Carter Blair and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Modern AI is opening the door to collective decision-making in which participants express their views as free-form text rather than voting on a fixed set of candidates. A natural idea is to embed these opinions in a vector space so that the substantial literature on facility location problems and fair clustering can be brought to bear. But standard text embeddings measure semantic similarity, whereas distances in facility location problems and fair clustering require what we call \textit{preferential similarity}: a participant's agreement with a piece of text should be inversely related to their distance from it. Off-the-shelf embeddings inherit a coarse preference signal through a correlation between semantic and preferential similarity, but fail to capture preferences when the correlation breaks. We formalize this as an invariance problem: text embedding models encode both a preference-relevant signal (stance and values) and semantic nuisance (style and wording), and the two are observationally correlated, so a geometry that relies on nuisance can appear preference-correct even when it is not. We show that synthetic training data designed to break this correlation provably shifts the optimal scorer away from nuisance-dominated cosine and significantly improves preference prediction across 11 online deliberation datasets.

Comments: 28 pages

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08360 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.08360v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08360

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Carter Blair [view email] [v1] Fri, 8 May 2026 18:15:14 UTC (324 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Embeddings for Preferences, Not Semantics, by Carter Blair and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Standard text embeddings capture semantic similarity, not the preferential similarity needed for facility location and fair clustering.
  • Preferential similarity requires that participants' agreement with text inversely relates to their distance from it.
  • Synthetic training data designed to break the correlation between semantic and preference signals improves prediction.
  • The method outperforms cosine-based scoring on 11 online deliberation datasets.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.