AI News HubLIVE
原文

DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents

DynaSchedBench introduces a diagnostic framework for DFJSP using a Sequential Event-Space Calibrator (SESC) to generate difficulty-stratified instances via Schedule Stress Index (SSI). It identifies an 'Observability Paradox' in LLM-based scheduling agents: providing oracle access to full structural information degrades performance compared to concise information. Tool-augmented and refinement strategies also fail to reliably improve performance.

Article intelligence

EngineersIntermediate

Key points

  • DynaSchedBench uses SESC and SSI to generate calibrated DFJSP instances, outperforming evolutionary baselines in efficiency.
  • LLM agents exhibit an Observability Paradox: full structural information harms decision-making.
  • Tool augmentation and refinement do not consistently boost LLM agent performance; most agents fall short of strong dispatching baselines.

Why it matters

This matters because dynaSchedBench uses SESC and SSI to generate calibrated DFJSP instances, outperforming evolutionary baselines in efficiency.

Technical impact

May affect model selection, inference cost, product capability, and evaluation benchmarks.

[2605.27566] DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents

[Submitted on 26 May 2026]

Title:DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents, by Shijie Cao and 2 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Progress in neural combinatorial optimization for Dynamic Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problem (DFJSP) is currently hindered by a methodological tension: static benchmarks encourage benchmark overfitting, while uncalibrated generators obscure algorithmic capability with stochastic noise. To resolve this, we introduce \textbf{DynaSchedBench}, a diagnostic framework for DFJSP that rigorously controls the instance-generation process. Instead of relying on parameter sampling, our approach utilizes Sequential Event-Space Calibrator (SESC) that computes a novel Schedule Stress Index (SSI) to stratify instances by difficulty. We demonstrate that SESC is substantially more computationally efficient than evolutionary baselines while converging reliably to the target metrics. The framework integrates modular components for instance generation, snapshot-based simulation, agents, evaluation, and visualization, thereby enabling rigorous testing of reactive and lookahead-based policies. Leveraging this calibrated environment, we identify key limitations of LLM-based scheduling agents. Specifically, in step-wise online decision-making for dynamic scheduling, we identify an ``Observability Paradox'': providing agents with oracle access to full structural information can degrade policy performance, underperforming concise information. Furthermore, despite substantial token overhead, tool-augmented and refinement strategies fail to reliably improve performance, and most LLM agents fail to consistently surpass strong dispatching baselines-behaving more like robust heuristic approximators than superior optimizers.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.27566 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.27566v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27566

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Shijie Cao [view email] [v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 18:36:54 UTC (730 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled DynaSchedBench: Calibrated Dynamic Scheduling Benchmarks and Observability Paradox in LLM-based Scheduling Agents, by Shijie Cao and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)