Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Domain-level metacognitive monitoring in frontier LLMs: A 33-model atlas

Summary

A study of 33 frontier LLMs using 1,500 MMLU items across six domains reveals that aggregate metacognitive scores mask within-model variation. Applied/Professional knowledge is easiest to monitor, while Formal Reasoning and Natural Science are hardest. Within-family profile clustering is significant for some families, and Gemma 4 shows substantial improvement over Gemma 3. The findings support domain-level screening before deployment.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Jon-Paul Cacioli
Domain-level metacognitive monitoring in frontier LLMs: A 33-model atlas
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.06673] Domain-level metacognitive monitoring in frontier LLMs: A 33-model atlas

[Submitted on 21 Apr 2026]

Title:Domain-level metacognitive monitoring in frontier LLMs: A 33-model atlas

View a PDF of the paper titled Domain-level metacognitive monitoring in frontier LLMs: A 33-model atlas, by Jon-Paul Cacioli

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Aggregate metacognitive quality scores mask within-model variation across MMLU benchmark domains. We administered 1,500 MMLU items (250 per domain, under an a priori six-domain grouping) to 33 frontier LLMs from eight model families and computed Type-2 AUROC per model-domain cell using verbalized confidence (0-100). Total observations: 47,151. Every model with above-chance aggregate monitoring showed non-trivial domain-level variation. Applied/Professional knowledge was reliably the easiest benchmark domain to monitor (mean AUROC = .742, ranked top-2 in 21 of 33 models); Formal Reasoning and Natural Science were reliably the hardest (one of the two ranked bottom-2 in 27 of 33 models). The three middle domains were statistically indistinguishable (Kendall's W = .164). A subject-level coherence analysis (within-domain similarity ratio = 0.95) confirms the six-domain grouping is a pragmatic benchmark taxonomy, not a validated latent construct. Within-family profile-shape clustering is significant for Anthropic, Google-Gemini, and Qwen (permutation p

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Evaluated 33 frontier LLMs across six MMLU domains using Type-2 AUROC of verbalized confidence (47,151 observations).
  • Applied/Professional knowledge easiest to monitor (mean AUROC .742), Formal Reasoning and Natural Science hardest.
  • Significant within-family clustering for Anthropic, Gemini, Qwen; Gemma 4 improved by .202 AUROC over Gemma 3.
  • Three models with invalid binary probes showed normal verbalized confidence profiles, indicating probe-format specificity.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.