AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

New arXiv research introduces BenchJack, an automated red-teaming system to audit AI agent benchmarks for reward hacking. The authors derive a taxonomy of eight flaw patterns from past incidents and apply BenchJack to 10 popular benchmarks, discovering 219 distinct flaws. An iterative generative-adversarial pipeline reduces hackable-task ratio from near 100% to under 10% within three iterations, fully patching WebArena and OSWorld. Results show evaluation pipelines lack adversarial mindset, and proactive auditing can close the security gap.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Hao Wang, Hanchen Li, Qiuyang Mang, Alvin Cheung, Koushik Sen, Dawn Song

[2605.12673] Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

[Submitted on 12 May 2026]

Title:Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack, by Hao Wang and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Agent benchmarks have become the de facto measure of frontier AI competence, guiding model selection, investment, and deployment. However, reward hacking, where agents maximize a score without performing the intended task, emerges spontaneously in frontier models without overfitting. We argue that benchmarks must be secure by design. From past incidents of reward hacks, we derive a taxonomy of eight recurring flaw patterns and compile them into the Agent-Eval Checklist for benchmark designers. We condense the insights into BenchJack, an automated red-teaming system that drives coding agents to audit benchmarks and identify possible reward-hacking exploits in a clairvoyant manner. Moreover, we extend BenchJack to an iterative generative-adversarial pipeline that discovers new flaws and patches them iteratively to improve benchmark robustness. We apply BenchJack to 10 popular agent benchmarks spanning software engineering, web navigation, desktop computing, and terminal operations. BenchJack synthesizes reward-hacking exploits that achieve near-perfect scores on most of the benchmarks without solving a single task, surfacing 219 distinct flaws across the eight classes. Moreover, BenchJack's extended pipeline reduces the hackable-task ratio from near 100% to under 10% on four benchmarks without fatal design flaws, fully patching WebArena and OSWorld within three iterations. Our results show that evaluation pipelines have not internalized an adversarial mindset, and that proactive auditing could help close the security gap for the fast-paced benchmarking space.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.12673 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2605.12673v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12673

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hao Wang [view email] [v1] Tue, 12 May 2026 19:22:45 UTC (1,741 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack, by Hao Wang and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CR

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)