Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning

Summary

This study presents a transfer learning framework for digital image forgery detection that combines compression-aware feature enhancement with CNNs. A hybrid input representation (RGB + FDIFF) and Youden Index-based threshold optimization are proposed. Evaluated on CASIA v2.0 with six architectures, DenseNet121 achieved highest accuracy and AUC, while ResNet50 had the best MCC, emphasizing that accuracy alone is insufficient for forensic applications.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Fatma Betul Buyuk, Gozde Karatas Baydogmus, Ali Buldu, Ayaulym Tulendiyeva, Zhuldyz Baizhumanova
Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08167] Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning, by Fatma Betul Buyuk and Gozde Karatas Baydogmus and Ali Buldu and Ayaulym Tulendiyeva and Zhuldyz Baizhumanova

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:The increasing availability of advanced image editing tools has led to a significant rise in manipulated digital content, posing serious challenges for digital forensics and information security. This study presents a transfer learning-based framework for digital image forgery detection that integrates compression-aware feature enhancement with deep convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures.

The proposed approach introduces a hybrid input representation that combines RGB images with compression difference-based features (FDIFF), explicitly highlighting subtle manipulation artifacts that are often difficult to detect. In addition, a model-specific adaptive threshold optimization strategy based on the Youden Index is employed to improve classification reliability by achieving a better balance between true positive and false positive rates.

Experiments conducted on the CASIA v2.0 dataset using multiple pretrained CNN architectures, including DenseNet121, VGG16, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, MobileNet, and InceptionV3, demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed framework. The models are evaluated using comprehensive performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and area under the ROC curve (AUC).

The results show that DenseNet121 achieves the highest accuracy and AUC, while ResNet50 provides the most balanced and reliable predictions with the highest MCC. The findings emphasize that relying solely on accuracy is insufficient for forensic applications, where minimizing false negatives is critical. Overall, the proposed framework improves the visibility of manipulation artifacts and enhances classification robustness, making it suitable for real-world digital image forgery detection scenarios.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08167 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.08167v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08167

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Gozde Karatas Baydogmus [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 17:48:36 UTC (313 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Digital Image Forgery Detection Using Transfer Learning, by Fatma Betul Buyuk and Gozde Karatas Baydogmus and Ali Buldu and Ayaulym Tulendiyeva and Zhuldyz Baizhumanova

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Hybrid input representation (RGB + compression difference features) highlights subtle manipulation artifacts
  • Youden Index-based adaptive threshold optimization balances true positive and false positive rates
  • DenseNet121 achieved highest accuracy and AUC; ResNet50 achieved highest MCC on CASIA v2.0
  • Forensic applications require metrics like recall and MCC beyond accuracy

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.