[2605.05353] Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans
Skip to main content
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
> cs > arXiv:2605.05353
Help | Advanced Search
All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text
Search
GO
quick links
Login
Help Pages
About
-->
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2605.05353 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 May 2026]
Title:Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans
Authors:Tosin Adewumi, Marcus Liwicki, Foteini Simistira Liwicki, Lama Alkhaled, Hamam Mokayed, Esra Sümer-Arpak
View a PDF of the paper titled Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans, by Tosin Adewumi and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This intervention study investigates the use of counterarguments in writing for critical thinking by students in the context of Generative AI (GenAI). This is especially as risks of cheating and cognitive offloading exist with the use of GenAI. We presented 36 students in a particular university course with 4 carefully selected thesis statements (from a set of popular debates) to write about anyone of them. We used six established rubrics (focus, logic, content, style, correctness and reference) to conduct three human assessments (two student peer-reviews and one experienced teacher) per writeup on a 5-point Likert scale for all the qualified samples (n) of 35 submissions (after disqualifying one for irregularity). Using the same rubrics and guidelines, we also assessed the submissions using six frontier LLMs as judges. Our mixed-method design included qualitative open-ended feedback per assessment and quantitative methods. The results reveal that (1) the students' self-written counterarguments to AI-generated content contains logic, among other things, which is a key component of critical thinking, and (2) GenAI can be successfully used at scale to assess students' written work, based on clear rubrics, and these assessments generally align with human assessments as shown with Gwets AC2 inter-rater reliability values of 0.33 for all the models except one.
Comments: 9 pages
Subjects:
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.05353 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2605.05353v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05353
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Tosin Adewumi [view email] [v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 18:27:03 UTC (890 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Counterargument for Critical Thinking as Judged by AI and Humans, by Tosin Adewumi and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.CL
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.AI
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
About
Help
contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Web Accessibility Assistance
arXiv Operational Status