跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:Could AI really wipe out humanity and hijack the internet?

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:We examine claims and counterclaims about the risks and calls to slow down the pace of AI development There have been some shocking claims in recent days about AI safety: we face a 10% chance of doom; AIs are worse than nukes; a “botnet” threatens the entire internet; it’s all a big tech psyop. We look at six claims and reactions to them. Continue reading...

來源The Guardian AI作者: Robert Booth, Dan Milmo and Aisha Down
待翻譯:Could AI really wipe out humanity and hijack the internet?
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

There have been some shocking claims in recent days about AI safety: we face a 10% chance of doom; AIs are worse than nukes; a “botnet” threatens the entire internet; it’s all a big tech psyop. We look at six claims and reactions to them. “In 6–12 months … a swarm could be capable of taking over the entire internet with a persistent botnet - potentially causing hundreds of billions of dollars in damage.” – Dario Amodei, chief executive of Anthropic, 12 September 2026 Amodei’s concerns should not be entirely dismissed but require a large shaker of salt, said Gary Marcus, an AI sceptic and emeritus professor at New York University. It was “nonsensical”, he said, to suggest the entire internet is vulnerable and that it was “pretty unclear how that happens without extreme negligence on the part of the labs themselves”. Marcus highlighted a recent assessment by the UK AI security institute that Mythos, one of Anthropic’s current leading-edge AIs could “autonomously compromise [only] small, weakly defended vulnerable systems”. With large parts of the internet driven by computer infrastructure owned by Cloudflare, Google, and AWS, Marcus, assessing the claim with two colleagues, said he doubted that any of those companies could be taken down or controlled for a prolonged period of time without government force. Less defended individual websites might be attacked but “the internet itself is very unlikely to crumble”, they said. Meanwhile Niels Rogge, an engineer at Hugging Face which was hacked by OpenAI agents, called the internet takeover claim “bizarre nonsense”. The hack into Hugging Face resulted from improper human control and “an insane amount of compute only they can afford”, he said. Add to Amodei’s assessment of an internet takeover within a year the view expressed on Monday by his Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, that the moment when AIs “start doing dangerous stuff” was in about 20 years, and the picture becomes more doubtful still. Prof Alan Woodward at the University of Surrey Centre for Cyber Security added that botnets tend to stall as the internet is not homogeneous and it is difficult to design them to persist in all its parts. Internet traffic is also resilient and tends to reroute around damage. “The AIs would not decide to do it on their own,” Woodward said. “It’s the humans that are responsible and the AI is a tool. That is what we need to control, not the AI.”

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師中級

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • We examine claims and counterclaims about the risks and calls to slow down the pace of AI development There have been some shocking claims in recent days about AI safety: we face…

技術影響

可能影響 Agent 架構、工具調用、工作流自動化和產品集成。

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。