Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source3 min read

Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks

Summary

A new study shows that repeatedly rewriting text generated by diffusion language models (up to five times) can effectively bypass watermark detection, reducing detection rates from 87.9% to 4.86%. The study tested four open-weight language models and five rewriting styles, finding that even a single rewrite reduces detection to 14%-41%, and multiple rewrites are even more effective.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Mohd Ruhul Ameen, Akif Islam, Nadim Mahmud, Md. Ekramul Hamid
Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.05503] Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks

Skip to main content

Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.

We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate

> cs > arXiv:2605.05503

Help | Advanced Search

All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text

Search

GO

quick links

Login

Help Pages

About

-->

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.05503 (cs)

[Submitted on 6 May 2026]

Title:Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks

Authors:Mohd Ruhul Ameen, Akif Islam, Nadim Mahmud, Md. Ekramul Hamid

View a PDF of the paper titled Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks, by Mohd Ruhul Ameen and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Statistical watermarking is a common approach for verifying whether text was written by a language model. Most existing schemes assume autoregressive generation, where tokens are produced left to right and contextual hashing is well defined. Diffusion language models generate text by denoising tokens in arbitrary order, so these schemes cannot be applied directly. A recent watermark by Gloaguen et al. addresses this gap for LLaDA 8B Instruct and reports true positive detection above 99%. This paper studies what happens when watermarked text is rewritten not once but several times. Using the same watermark configuration, 1,605 watermarked completions of about 300 tokens each are produced across five WaterBench domains. Each completion is rewritten by four open weight language models, from 1.5B to 8B parameters, none of which know the watermark key. Five rewrite styles are tested: paraphrase, humanize, simplify, academic, and summarize expand. Each style is chained for up to five hops, producing 160,500 rewritten texts in total. The watermark is detected on 87.9% of the original outputs at the standard significance threshold. After a single rewrite, detection falls to between 14% and 41% depending on the rewriter and style. After five chained rewrites, detection falls to 4.86%, meaning 94.76% of the originally detected texts are no longer flagged. After three rewrites, the detector score has dropped 86% of the way from its watermarked baseline toward the null distribution. Repeated rewriting is therefore a much stronger attack than a single rewrite, and the result holds across all four rewriters tested.

Comments: 13 pages, 5 figures, 3 tables

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.05503 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.05503v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05503

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Akif Islam [view email] [v1] Wed, 6 May 2026 23:00:26 UTC (102 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Chainwash: Multi-Step Rewriting Attacks on Diffusion Language Model Watermarks, by Mohd Ruhul Ameen and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

About

Help

contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact

subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe

Copyright

Privacy Policy

Web Accessibility Assistance

arXiv Operational Status

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Watermarking diffusion language models is challenging due to arbitrary token generation order; existing schemes mainly target autoregressive models.
  • A single rewrite reduces watermark detection to 14%-41%, while five chained rewrites leave only 4.86% detection.
  • The experiment involved four LMs and five styles, generating 160,500 rewritten texts.
  • Multi-step rewriting is a much stronger attack than a single rewrite, and the result holds across all rewriters tested.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.