Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

CFC26: Building Evaluations for Deployment in Sonar-Based Fish Counting

Summary

arXiv:2610.22549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate counts of fish populations are essential for monitoring ecosystems and making decisions for conservation, harvest limits, and river management. In many field deployments, these counts are obtained from sonar videos that experts must inspect manually, making large-scale monitoring slow, expensive, and difficult. Automated counting systems have been proposed as a scalable alternative, but so far this promise has been difficult to realize in deployment. Developing evaluations that better reflect real-world deployment conditions will help close this gap and drive improvements in counting performance in practice. To achieve this, we propose Caltech Fish Counting 2026 (CFC26), a new dataset with improved evaluation protocols that simulate…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Madison Van Horn, Suzanne Stathatos, Sevan Brodjian, Justin Kay, Kai Van Brunt, Erik Young, Sara Beery, Pietro Perona, Michael Hobley
CFC26: Building Evaluations for Deployment in Sonar-Based Fish Counting
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 15 Oct 2026]

Title:CFC26: Building Evaluations for Deployment in Sonar-Based Fish Counting

View a PDF of the paper titled CFC26: Building Evaluations for Deployment in Sonar-Based Fish Counting, by Madison Van Horn and 8 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Accurate counts of fish populations are essential for monitoring ecosystems and making decisions for conservation, harvest limits, and river management. In many field deployments, these counts are obtained from sonar videos that experts must inspect manually, making large-scale monitoring slow, expensive, and difficult. Automated counting systems have been proposed as a scalable alternative, but so far this promise has been difficult to realize in deployment. Developing evaluations that better reflect real-world deployment conditions will help close this gap and drive improvements in counting performance in practice. To achieve this, we propose Caltech Fish Counting 2026 (CFC26), a new dataset with improved evaluation protocols that simulate deployment to seen and novel rivers, testing in-distribution and out-of-distribution performance. We expand the CFC22 dataset to eleven deployment locations across nine Pacific salmon river systems from Alaska to Northern California, capturing a broader geographical and ecological range of data. We additionally introduce two new evaluation metrics for counting, nMNE and nMANE, that mirror the operational workflow that experts use and help surface errors that frame-level detection metrics do not capture. Using these metrics, we reveal previously-concealed directional bias in upstream vs downstream counts, which would have direct and significant ecological implications if undetected. The dataset and code are publicly available on CaltechDATA and GitHub.

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.22549 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2610.22549v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22549

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Madison Mitchell [view email] [v1] Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:44:53 UTC (1,811 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled CFC26: Building Evaluations for Deployment in Sonar-Based Fish Counting, by Madison Van Horn and 8 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.22549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate counts of fish populations are essential for monitoring ecosystems and making decisions for conservation, harvest limits,…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.