Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?

Summary

A new study evaluates large language models' ability to adapt responses to the certainty of retrieved information, finding systematic limitations and proposing an interaction strategy that reduces obedience errors by 25% on average.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Behzad Shayegh, Mohamed Osama Ahmed, Fred Tung, Leo Feng
Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.06919] Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?

[Submitted on 7 May 2026]

Title:Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?

View a PDF of the paper titled Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?, by Behzad Shayegh and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Large language models have demonstrated impressive retrieval-augmented capabilities. However, a crucial area remains underexplored: their ability to appropriately adapt responses to the certainty of the retrieved information. It is a limitation with real consequences in high-stakes domains like medicine and finance. We evaluate eight LLMs on their context-certainty obedience, measuring how well they adjust responses to match expressed context certainty. Our analysis reveals systematic limitations: LLMs struggle to recall prior knowledge after observing an uncertain context, misinterpret expressed certainties, and overtrust complex contexts. To address these, we propose an interaction strategy combining prior reminders, certainty recalibration, and context simplification. This approach reduces obedience errors by 25% on average, without modifying model weights, demonstrating the efficacy of interaction design in enhancing LLM reliability. Our contributions include a principled evaluation metric, empirical insights into LLMs' uncertainty handling, and a portable strategy to improve context-certainty obedience across diverse LLMs.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.06919 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.06919v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.06919

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Behzad Shayegh [view email] [v1] Thu, 7 May 2026 20:29:22 UTC (359 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Can LLMs Take Retrieved Information with a Grain of Salt?, by Behzad Shayegh and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Evaluated 8 LLMs on context-certainty obedience
  • LLMs struggle to recall prior knowledge after uncertain context, misinterpret certainties, and overtrust complex contexts
  • Proposed interaction strategy combines prior reminders, certainty recalibration, and context simplification
  • Reduces obedience errors by 25% on average without modifying model weights

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.