[Submitted on 3 Nov 2026]
Title:Can Large Language Models Review the Scientific Literature? A Test Against a 102-Article Benchmark
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Large Language Models Review the Scientific Literature? A Test Against a 102-Article Benchmark, by Abdullah Al Kalbani and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to support scientific literature reviews, yet evaluations often examine individual tasks rather than the review process as a whole. We assess six AI tools across four stages: finding relevant articles, interpreting them, synthesizing across them, and proposing future research. The benchmark is a published review of the Spanish plume weather pattern and its 102-article corpus.
In the initial searches, five tools collectively identified 57 articles, with the best individual tool finding 42. Institutional library access increased discovery from 42 to 82 articles for Codex and from 15 to 79 for Claude Code. Given the complete corpus of 102 PDFs, three tools correctly identified all 18 articles discussing the Spanish plume substantially, but incorrectly classified 40% to 79% of the 84 passing mentions as substantial. The same three tools produced syntheses evaluated blindly by two domain experts. Although largely accurate, the syntheses provided limited insight and sometimes contained unsupported claims, quotation errors, and exaggerated statements of consensus. Finally, all three tools proposed research directions broader than the Spanish plume literature, although two approached questions identified in the benchmark review.
No single tool performed best across all tasks. We provide eight recommendations for researchers using AI tools in literature reviews. Our findings suggest that LLMs can assist with discovering and interpreting scientific literature, particularly when institutional access is available, but cannot replace expert judgment in evaluating evidence or synthesizing research.
Comments: 34 pages, 7 figures, 6 tables. Data, prompts, analysis scripts and results: this https URL (GitHub: this https URL)
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Digital Libraries (cs.DL)
MSC classes: 68T50, 68P20, 68T07
Cite as: arXiv:2611.05459 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2611.05459v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05459
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Submission history
From: Abdullah Al Kalbani [view email] [v1] Tue, 3 Nov 2026 18:57:20 UTC (811 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Can Large Language Models Review the Scientific Literature? A Test Against a 102-Article Benchmark, by Abdullah Al Kalbani and 4 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new | recent | 2026-11
Change to browse by:
cs cs.DL
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Loading...
Data provided by:
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)