Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER

Summary

A controlled benchmarking study finds that while pretraining improves time series classification accuracy over random-weight counterparts by up to 23 percentage points, frozen representations from forecasting foundation models still underperform the strongest non-pretrained baseline in 15 of 17 settings. The authors stress the need for strong task-specific baselines and random-weight controls.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Rishit Jain, Rishit Kar, Chetashri Bhadane, Nilesh Patil
Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]

Title:Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER

View a PDF of the paper titled Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER, by Rishit Jain and 3 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Forecasting foundation models are increasingly used as frozen feature extractors for time series classification, but it remains unclear whether their pretrained representations offer an advantage over strong classifiers that do not require pretraining. This raises an important question: do these representations provide useful information beyond what the model architecture alone can capture, particularly when labelled data are scarce? We present a controlled benchmarking of two forecasting models, Reverso and Chronos-Bolt, on six large datasets from the MONSTER benchmark, using 1%, 10%, and 100% of the available training labels. We compare their frozen representations against four established time series classification methods and random-weight versions of the same forecasting models. Our results show that pretraining improves classification accuracy over random-weight counterparts on five of the six datasets, with gains of up to 23 percentage points. However, the frozen representations do not reliably outperform the strongest non-pretrained baseline in any setting: they perform worse in 15 of 17 settings and tie in the remaining two. Further experiments show that restoring amplitude information recovers part of the performance gap, while fine-tuning and forecast-error features do not close it. These findings highlight the importance of strong task specific baselines and random weight controls when evaluating forecasting foundation models for classification. Our code is available at this https URL.

Comments: Asian Conference on Machine Learning, FMLTS Workshop, 2026

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2611.06988 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2611.06988v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06988

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Rishit Kar [view email] [v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 16:50:28 UTC (56 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER, by Rishit Jain and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Pretraining improves classification accuracy over random-weight versions on five of six datasets, with gains up to 23 percentage points.
  • Frozen representations underperform the strongest non-pretrained baseline in 15 of 17 settings and tie in the remaining two.
  • Restoring amplitude information recovers part of the gap, but fine-tuning and forecast-error features do not close it.
  • Evaluating forecasting foundation models for classification requires strong task-specific baselines and random-weight controls.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.

Big Models, Small Gains: Frozen Forecasters as Classifiers on MONSTER | AI News Hub