Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions

Summary

A study benchmarks ResNet backbones in RT-DETR for round object detection under environmental variations. ResNet50 excels under illumination changes (accuracy near 1.00, confidence up to 0.869, latency ~0.058-0.059 ms), while ResNet34 performs best under background changes (confidence up to 0.887). Results show optimal architecture depends on the environmental variation, with intermediate-depth models offering the best balance.

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Pamela Barboza, V\'ictor Castelli, Bel\'en Pereira, Ricardo Grando, Bruna de Vargas, Augusto Calfani
Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.08136] Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions

[Submitted on 1 May 2026]

Title:Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions, by Pamela Barboza and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Visual perception plays a central role in competitive robotics, where environmental variations can directly affect real-time detection performance. The related literature on transformer-based detectors lack information regarding the impact of backbone scale and environmental settings on model performance. This work presents a comparative evaluation of RT-DETR for detecting round objects under environmental and hyperparameter variations relevant to competitive robotics. Four ResNet backbones (ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, and ResNet101) were compared using dropout rates, analyzing their effect on confidence and accuracy. All models were trained under the same configuration and evaluated under changes in lighting and background contrast. Environmental conditions primarily impact prediction confidence, while inference latency remains largely unaffected and classification accuracy stays consistently high, approaching or above 1.00 in most cases. Two distinct behaviors were observed. Under illumination variation, ResNet50 achieves the best trade-off, combining near-perfect accuracy, confidence values up to approximately 0.869 and latency around 0.058-0.059 ms. Under background variation, ResNet34 provides the most balanced performance, reaching near-perfect accuracy and higher confidence values up to approximately 0.887. These results indicate that the optimal architecture depends on the type of environmental variation, with intermediate-depth models offering the best balance between performance and efficiency.

Comments: Accepted at the International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications (DATA) 2026

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)

Cite as: arXiv:2605.08136 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2605.08136v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.08136

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Ricardo Grando [view email] [v1] Fri, 1 May 2026 20:57:43 UTC (2,531 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Benchmarking ResNet Backbones in RT-DETR: Impact of Depth and Regularization under environmental conditions, by Pamela Barboza and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.RO

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

InvestorsAdvanced

Key points

  • Compared four ResNet backbones (18, 34, 50, 101) in RT-DETR with varying dropout rates.
  • Under illumination variation, ResNet50 achieved best trade-off: near-perfect accuracy, high confidence, low latency.
  • Under background variation, ResNet34 provided most balanced performance with higher confidence.
  • Optimal backbone depends on environmental condition; intermediate-depth models are preferable.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.