跳到主要內容
AI News HubLIVE
來源內容 · 翻譯待補全2 分鐘閱讀

待翻譯:BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes

文章摘要

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:arXiv:2610.20627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured Global South traffic remains unclear. We introduce BD-HazardVLM, a diagnostic benchmark of 500 Bangladesh road-scene images, comprising 375 from RSUD20K and 125 from TFP-BD, annotated for hazard presence, primary hazard category, risk timing, severity, defensive actions, visible evidence, and hallucination- and Western-road-bias traps. We evaluate Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B, and MiniCPM-V-4.6 using a shared zero-shot task definition and structured output schema. Binary hazard-presence accuracy ranges from 88.0 percent to 89.2 percent, essentially matching the 89.0 percent majority-cl…

來源arXiv Computer Vision作者: Abdullah Al Maruf, Md. Sajedul Islam, Tanmoy Mridha, Irfan Hossain Bhuiyan
待翻譯:BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes
報告錯誤

更正渠道尚未開通,可先複製下方文章資訊留存。

查看更正說明
直接讀正文

AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。

[Submitted on 28 Sep 2026] Title:BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes View a PDF of the paper titled BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes, by Abdullah Al Maruf and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured Global South traffic remains unclear. We introduce BD-HazardVLM, a diagnostic benchmark of 500 Bangladesh road-scene images, comprising 375 from RSUD20K and 125 from TFP-BD, annotated for hazard presence, primary hazard category, risk timing, severity, defensive actions, visible evidence, and hallucination- and Western-road-bias traps. We evaluate Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL3-8B, and MiniCPM-V-4.6 using a shared zero-shot task definition and structured output schema. Binary hazard-presence accuracy ranges from 88.0 percent to 89.2 percent, essentially matching the 89.0 percent majority-class baseline. Fine-grained reasoning is substantially weaker: category accuracy remains below 40 percent, risk-timing accuracy ranges from 1.6 percent to 12.4 percent, and exact defensive-action matching remains below 2 percent. Although InternVL3-8B achieves the highest severity accuracy at 61.2 percent, it has zero recall on the 58 high-severity cases. Qwen exhibits severe category mode collapse, while all models show weak latent-hazard anticipation and near-zero self-reported trap recognition. For the evaluated models, these findings show that coarse hazard recognition does not imply reliable fine-grained defensive-driving reasoning and motivate geographically diverse safety evaluation. Comments: Accepted at the ECCV 2026 Workshop on Safe and Defensive Autonomous Driving (SDAD). 16 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO) Cite as: arXiv:2610.20627 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2610.20627v1 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20627 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Abdullah Al Maruf [view email] [v1] Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:54:45 UTC (2,278 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes, by Abdullah Al Maruf and 3 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Additional Features Audio Summary Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-10 Change to browse by: cs cs.LG cs.RO References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

展開要點與分析

文章情報

工程師進階

要點

  • AI 服務暫時不可用,系統已先保留來源內容與降級元數據。
  • arXiv:2610.20627v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly used for driving-scene understanding, yet their defensive reasoning under weakly structured…

要點與分析由自動化流程生成,可能有誤,請結合原始來源核實。