AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms

Auto-FL-Research (AFR) is a constrained coding-agent workflow for federated learning algorithmic recipe search. It is evaluated on five healthcare FLamby tasks and six LEAF profiles, showing gains on multiple tasks but also revealing seed-sensitive and search-selected failures.

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Holger R. Roth, Ziyue Xu, Chester Chen, Daguang Xu, Peter Cnudde, Andrew Feng

-->

[Submitted on 1 Jul 2026]

Title:Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms

View a PDF of the paper titled Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms, by Holger R. Roth and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Federated learning (FL) research often depends on many small but consequential algorithmic choices: optimizer variants, server aggregation rules, local training schedules, normalization, regularization, and model architecture. These choices are expensive to explore manually and difficult to compare fairly when candidate changes can also alter the FL training or evaluation path. In this work, we present Auto-FL-Research (AFR), a constrained coding-agent workflow for FL algorithmic recipe search. Agents may propose and implement candidate training algorithms, including server aggregation rules, client update schedules, local objectives, and registered model variants, while task profiles fix the mutation surface, compute budget, communication contract, and final model evaluation. Each campaign records candidate scores, runtime, edited files, artifacts, and failure status. We evaluate AFR on five healthcare cross-silo FLamby tasks and on grouped-client profiles for the five fixed LEAF datasets plus the LEAF synthetic task. Five-seed repeat evaluations support gains on four FLamby tasks and five of six LEAF profiles, while also exposing seed-sensitive and search-selected failure cases. Same-budget controls show that several gains correspond to FL-recipe changes, whereas other improvements are recovered by fixed-surface scalar controls or fail under repeat or held-out evaluation. These mixed outcomes are part of the contribution: they show how agent-generated candidates can be separated into repeated FL mechanisms, fixed-surface tuning effects, and selected single-run artifacts.

Comments: 8 pages; 5 figures; 6 tables

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.01366 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.01366v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.01366

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Holger R. Roth [view email] [v1] Wed, 1 Jul 2026 18:28:09 UTC (1,237 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Auto-FL-Research: Agentic Search for Federated Learning Algorithms, by Holger R. Roth and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)