Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence

Summary

arXiv:2610.14005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Under the accelerated pace of AI development, any benchmark whose difficulty is calibrated with humans or current AI systems becomes circular, or saturates soon. How can we then evaluate machines that may become more capable than the current machines and the people who write the tests? One answer to the question hinges on inverse problems, inductive inference questions for which difficulty depends on the complexity of the underlying mechanism, given the observations and the previous knowledge. Levin's Kt, a computable variant of Kolmogorov complexity, puts a theoretical upper bound to that difficulty, balancing the simplest representation encoding for the mechanism and the logarithm of the time steps to run that mechanism. Previous tests der…

SourcearXiv AIAuthor: Jose Hernandez-Orallo
Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 27 Sep 2026]

Title:Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence

View a PDF of the paper titled Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence, by Jose Hernandez-Orallo

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Under the accelerated pace of AI development, any benchmark whose difficulty is calibrated with humans or current AI systems becomes circular, or saturates soon. How can we then evaluate machines that may become more capable than the current machines and the people who write the tests? One answer to the question hinges on inverse problems, inductive inference questions for which difficulty depends on the complexity of the underlying mechanism, given the observations and the previous knowledge. Levin's Kt, a computable variant of Kolmogorov complexity, puts a theoretical upper bound to that difficulty, balancing the simplest representation encoding for the mechanism and the logarithm of the time steps to run that mechanism. Previous tests derived from Levin's Kt, such as the original C-test, are based on minimalistic Universal Turing Machines (UTM), capable of very limited representations and no previous knowledge. Reasoning large language models (LLM) are UTMs that capture a compendium of human culture as knowledge, using prompts as natural language programs. This paper presents the first test based on Levin's Kt with LLMs as representational machines. Fresh test items can be produced at high difficulties, estimated in a ratio scale measured in bits, before any human or frontier model can solve them. We formalise the measure, devise a lightweight generation and certification pipeline, explore the effect of the power of the reference machine and the gap between examiner and examinee. We produce a first battery of certified items administered to twelve LLMs. The resulting agent characteristic curves decrease with difficulty, down to the uncharted high-difficulty region, the supra-intelligence window of items we can certify, yet beyond generations of frontier intelligence.

Comments: Preprint, under review. 63 pages. Code and data at this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.14005 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.14005v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14005

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jose Hernandez-Orallo [view email] [v1] Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:41:46 UTC (541 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Artificiality's First Exam: An LLM-Referenced C-test for Supraintelligence, by Jose Hernandez-Orallo

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.CL cs.LG

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2610.14005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Under the accelerated pace of AI development, any benchmark whose difficulty is calibrated with humans or current AI systems become…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.