Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation

Summary

The paper introduces an agentic framework for traceable multimodal emotion reasoning that uses modality-specific perception agents, an integration agent, and an evidence-grounded verification stage to generate targeted prompt patches, improving F-scores across four MLLMs on MER2025 without updating model weights.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Elyas Rashno, Farhana Zulkernine
An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 3 Oct 2026]

Title:An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation

View a PDF of the paper titled An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation, by Elyas Rashno and Farhana Zulkernine

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:LLM-based multimodal emotion reasoning systems perform well on standard benchmarks, but improving them through instruction tuning can be computationally expensive. Agentic pipelines built from frozen models avoid this cost, but introduce a different challenge: when a prediction is wrong, the system must identify which agent or stage caused the error. We address this problem with an agentic framework for traceable multimodal emotion reasoning and prompt-space adaptation. Modality-specific perception agents analyze visual, acoustic, and lexical inputs and post evidence-cited observations to a shared board. An integration agent combines these observations with retrieved multimodal examples to produce an emotion description, label set, and supporting citations, while an MLLM critic can request one revision before the output is finalized. For incorrect predictions, a separate evidence-grounded verification stage applies deterministic checks to verify that cited evidence and references are valid, and an entailment check to determine whether the final claims are supported by that evidence. Detected failures are then grouped by the responsible component and failure type, converted into targeted prompt patches, and accepted only after validation on a held-out set. This adapts the agent prompts without updating model weights. On the MER2025 dataset, targeted prompt adaptation outperforms the frozen static pipeline on all four MLLMs, ranging from 2B to 38B parameters, and matches or outperforms undifferentiated reflection baselines on each of them: VideoLLaMA3-2B, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, and InternVL2.5-38B. It improves F-score by 0.6--2.2 points depending on the backbone, including an increase from 52.3 to 54.5 on Qwen2.5-VL-7B.

Comments: Accepted at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Real-Time Multimodal Conversational AI (ReMuCAI), Paris, France. OpenReview: this https URL

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multimedia (cs.MM); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.31685 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.31685v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31685

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Elyas Rashno [view email] [v1] Sat, 3 Oct 2026 23:36:10 UTC (4,062 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation, by Elyas Rashno and Farhana Zulkernine

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI cs.MM eess eess.IV

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Modality-specific perception agents analyze visual, acoustic, and lexical inputs and post evidence-cited observations to a shared board.
  • An evidence-grounded verification stage applies deterministic and entailment checks to identify failures, which are grouped and converted into targeted prompt patches validated on a held-out set.
  • On MER2025, the method outperforms the frozen static pipeline on four MLLMs ranging from 2B to 38B parameters, improving F-score by 0.6 to 2.2 points.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.