[2605.00334] AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?
Skip to main content
Learn about arXiv becoming an independent nonprofit.
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
> cs > arXiv:2605.00334
Help | Advanced Search
All fields Title Author Abstract Comments Journal reference ACM classification MSC classification Report number arXiv identifier DOI ORCID arXiv author ID Help pages Full text
Search
GO
quick links
Login
Help Pages
About
-->
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2605.00334 (cs)
[Submitted on 1 May 2026]
Title:AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?
Authors:Ranit Karmakar, Jayita Chatterjee
View a PDF of the paper titled AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?, by Ranit Karmakar and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Production agentic systems make many model calls per user request, and most of those calls are short, structured, and routine. This raises a practical routing question that existing evaluations do not directly answer: which parts of an agent workflow truly require large frontier intelligence, and which can be handled by smaller models? We introduce AgentFloor, a deterministic 30-task benchmark organized as a six-tier capability ladder, spanning instruction following, tool use, multi-step coordination, and long-horizon planning under persistent constraints. We evaluate 16 open-weight models, from 0.27B to 32B parameters, alongside GPT-5 across 16,542 scored runs. Our results reveal a clear boundary of model necessity. Small and mid-sized open-weight models are already sufficient for much of the short-horizon, structured tool use work that dominates real agent pipelines, and in aggregate, the strongest open-weight model matches GPT-5 on our benchmark while being substantially cheaper and faster to run. The gap appears most clearly on long-horizon planning tasks that require sustained coordination and reliable constraint tracking over many steps, where frontier models still hold an advantage, though neither side reaches strong reliability. We also find that this boundary is not explained by scale alone: some failures respond to targeted interventions, but the effects are model-specific rather than universal. These findings suggest a practical design principle for agentic systems: use smaller open-weight models for the broad base of routine actions, and reserve large frontier models for the narrower class of tasks that truly demand deeper planning and control. We release the benchmark, harness, sweep configurations, and full run corpus.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.00334 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.00334v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00334
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Ranit Karmakar [view email] [v1] Fri, 1 May 2026 01:25:56 UTC (189 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?, by Ranit Karmakar and 1 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new | recent | 2026-05
Change to browse by:
cs cs.CL
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
About
Help
contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Web Accessibility Assistance
arXiv Operational Status