AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning

This paper proposes using adjustment speed as a safety constraint for nonstationary reinforcement learning. The key idea is to define safety in terms of adaptation feasibility: when the required adaptation exceeds the system's calibrated recovery capacity, the framework proactively tightens actions and activates shielding to reduce unsafe behavior. Experiments in a driving environment show reduced safety violations during short windows aligned with context changes.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Timothy Tomashevskiy

-->

[Submitted on 21 Jul 2026]

Title:Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning, by Timothy Tomashevskiy

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Ensuring safety in reinforcement learning under nonstationarity requires determining whether a learning system can safely adapt to forecasted environmental change within the required recovery horizon. Existing safe reinforcement learning methods typically assume stationary environments and do not explicitly consider adaptation speed as a safety concern. However, when environments evolve over time, delayed adaptation may result in transient unsafe behavior.

This paper proposes adjustment speed as a safety constraint for nonstationary reinforcement learning. The central idea is to define safety in terms of adaptation feasibility: future states or regions may become unsafe when the adaptation required to remain safe exceeds the learning system's calibrated recovery capacity. The proposed framework uses learned context representations and short-horizon context forecasts to estimate adaptation demand and compare it with the agent's achievable adaptation capacity.

When predicted adaptation demand exceeds the calibrated recovery capacity, the framework proactively tightens the admissible action set and activates an action-level shield to reduce unsafe behavior before violations occur.

Experiments in a nonstationary driving environment show that the proposed approach primarily reduces safety violations in short-horizon windows aligned with context changes. Ablation studies further show that shielding is more conservative for peak- and tail-risk suppression, while optimization-level adjustment provides additional reductions in short-horizon switch-conditioned violations.

These results support adaptation feasibility as a practical safety principle for reinforcement learning under nonstationarity and demonstrate that proactive intervention can improve safety during periods of environmental change.

Comments: 15 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Preprint

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as: arXiv:2607.21646 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.21646v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21646

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Timofey Tomashevskiy [view email] [v1] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 23:52:07 UTC (405 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Adjustment Speed as a Safety Constraint for Nonstationary Reinforcement Learning, by Timothy Tomashevskiy

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-07

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)