Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty

Summary

The paper formalizes adaptive personalization under preference epistemic uncertainty and introduces a multilingual benchmark with 250 personas, 5 languages, and 25K conversational turns. Across eight models, it finds a recognition-generation gap: models select appropriate strategies when choosing among options but suffer a 35-46% drop in strategy calibration during open-ended generation, systematically defaulting to exploit-first behavior. Targeted training narrows the user acceptability generalization gap by about one third.

SourcearXiv Computational LinguisticsAuthor: Priyanka Dey, Rajarshi Das, Vikas Bahirwani, Qi Zeng, Julia Kruk, Qi Qi
Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]

Title:Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty

View a PDF of the paper titled Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty, by Priyanka Dey and 5 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Human preferences change over time: an established preference may remain valid over time, become uncertain as context shifts, or be explicitly revised. Effective personalization requires conversational AI to adapt its response strategy to evolving preferences rather than relying on passive memory retrieval. We formalize this capability as adaptive personalization under epistemic uncertainty. A human preference study further confirms that people favor state-contingent response strategies as preference uncertainty changes. To evaluate whether language models mirror this adaptation, we create a multilingual benchmark spanning 250 personas, 5 languages, and 25K conversational turns that decouples strategy selection from response execution. Across eight closed- and open-weight models, we uncover a recognition-generation gap: models reliably identify appropriate strategies when selecting among candidate options, but collapse during open-ended generation, suffering a 35-46% drop in strategy calibration. Crucially, this failure is systematic: models default to exploit-first behavior, over-relying on existing preferences regardless of preference epistemic uncertainty. We show this failure is addressable: while prompting interventions fail, targeted training that supervises models' internal strategy representations toward state-conditional human preferences narrows the user acceptability generalization gap by a third on out-of-distribution personas and conversational styles.

Subjects:

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as: arXiv:2610.40930 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.40930v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40930

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Priyanka Dey [view email] [v1] Thu, 29 Oct 2026 20:01:11 UTC (1,147 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Adaptive Personalization Under Preference Epistemic Uncertainty, by Priyanka Dey and 5 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.CL

new | recent | 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Formalizes adaptive personalization under epistemic uncertainty, requiring conversational AI to adjust response strategies as preference uncertainty changes rather than relying on passive memory retrieval.
  • A human preference study confirms that people favor state-contingent response strategies as uncertainty shifts.
  • The multilingual benchmark covers 250 personas, 5 languages, and 25K turns, decoupling strategy selection from response execution.
  • Eight models show a 35-46% strategy calibration drop in open-ended generation and a systematic exploit-first bias; prompting fails, but targeted training narrows the acceptability generalization gap by roughly one third.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.