Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Original source2 min read

A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning

Summary

A study shows that in self-play reinforcement learning, removing all positive-reach contingent decision points causes agents to rapidly collapse to a near-maximal loss fixed point, while preserving even one such point prevents collapse. The mechanism is co-adaptation under constraint, not the perturbation itself, and is timing-invariant, reversible, and intensified by function approximation.

SourcearXiv Machine LearningAuthor: Arahan Kujur
A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[2605.16315] A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning

[Submitted on 4 May 2026]

Title:A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning

View a PDF of the paper titled A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning, by Arahan Kujur

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:We show that a threshold in decision capacity determines whether self-play reinforcement learning agents collapse under asymmetric rule perturbations. Across poker variants, matrix games, a dice game, and multiple learning algorithms, eliminating all positive-reach contingent decisions causes rapid convergence to a deterministic exploitation attractor, a fixed point at near-maximal loss. Preserving even a single positive-reach contingent decision point prevents this collapse. A frozen baseline and fixed-opponent control confirm that the mechanism is co-adaptation under constraint, not the perturbation itself. The phenomenon is timing-invariant, fully reversible upon action restoration, and intensifies under function approximation. These results establish a sharp threshold at zero reach-weighted contingent action capacity, with severity scaling continuously via reach-weighted capacity in the tested domains.

Comments: 18 pages, 7 figures

Subjects:

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

MSC classes: 91A05, 91A26, 68T05, 68T42

ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.8; F.2.2

Cite as: arXiv:2605.16315 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.16315v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.16315

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Arahan Kujur [view email] [v1] Mon, 4 May 2026 19:09:14 UTC (1,022 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled A Structural Threshold in Decision Capacity Governs Collapse in Self-Play Reinforcement Learning, by Arahan Kujur

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.LG

new | recent | 2026-05

Change to browse by:

cs cs.AI

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

IArxiv recommender toggle

IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

EngineersAdvanced

Key points

  • Eliminating all positive-reach contingent decisions leads to collapse to a deterministic exploitation attractor at near-maximal loss.
  • Preserving any single positive-reach decision point prevents collapse entirely.
  • Freeze and fixed-opponent controls confirm collapse is due to co-adaptation under constraint.
  • Collapse worsens with function approximation and is fully reversible upon action restoration.

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.