Skip to content
AI News HubLIVE
Source content · Analysis pending2 min read

Wind on Trees: Testing Physical Grounding in Dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting

Summary

arXiv:2609.17810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Monocular reconstruction of wind-driven vegetation is severely underconstrained: motion along the viewing direction is largely unobservable, a moving canopy offers few reliable correspondences, and nearly the entire scene is dynamic, providing little static reference. Directly-learned deformation fields in 4D Gaussian Splatting therefore optimize photometric consistency rather than recover the motion that produced it. We replace that field with a physically parameterized deformation prior: one damped harmonic oscillator per rigid part, driven by the observed wind and integrated by differentiable RK4, supervised photometrically alone. To test whether such a prior is physically grounded rather than merely well fit, we build a controlled synthe…

SourcearXiv Computer VisionAuthor: Weiying Chen, Edmond Lou
Wind on Trees: Testing Physical Grounding in Dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting
Report an error

The correction channel is not available yet. You can copy the article reference below for later.

Correction instructions
Read article

[Submitted on 15 Sep 2026]

Title:Wind on Trees: Testing Physical Grounding in Dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting

View a PDF of the paper titled Wind on Trees: Testing Physical Grounding in Dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting, by Weiying Chen and 1 other authors

View PDF HTML (experimental)

Abstract:Monocular reconstruction of wind-driven vegetation is severely underconstrained: motion along the viewing direction is largely unobservable, a moving canopy offers few reliable correspondences, and nearly the entire scene is dynamic, providing little static reference. Directly-learned deformation fields in 4D Gaussian Splatting therefore optimize photometric consistency rather than recover the motion that produced it. We replace that field with a physically parameterized deformation prior: one damped harmonic oscillator per rigid part, driven by the observed wind and integrated by differentiable RK4, supervised photometrically alone. To test whether such a prior is physically grounded rather than merely well fit, we build a controlled synthetic testbed of three procedurally generated trees spanning an order of magnitude in skeleton complexity, whose per-part natural frequency follows from its own geometry and whose damping ratio is a fixed constant, both held out of training. On it, we measure held-out views, temporal extrapolation, zero-shot transfer to unseen wind speeds, and recovery of the physical parameters themselves. The prior costs appearance fidelity on in-distribution views and extrapolates markedly better outside the training window and the training wind, while parameter recovery is far weaker than it first appears: frequency recovery survives an untrained null control on only the sparsest of the three trees, and damping is not recovered at all.

Comments: Workshop Version of ECCV 2026 3DWM Workshop

Subjects:

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

Cite as: arXiv:2609.17810 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.17810v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17810

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Weiying Chen [view email] [v1] Tue, 15 Sep 2026 20:27:16 UTC (4,561 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Wind on Trees: Testing Physical Grounding in Dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting, by Weiying Chen and 1 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Current browse context:

cs.CV

new | recent | 2026-09

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

NASA ADS

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

Loading...

Data provided by:

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate (What is Replicate?)

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Key points and analysis

Article intelligence

ResearchersAdvanced

Key points

  • AI generation is temporarily unavailable; this entry was preserved with deterministic fallback metadata.
  • arXiv:2609.17810v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Monocular reconstruction of wind-driven vegetation is severely underconstrained: motion along the viewing direction is largely unob…

Highlights and analysis are generated automatically and may contain errors. Check the original source.