待翻譯:Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of LLMs in physician
AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源摘要,待恢復後補全翻譯:--> [Submitted on 14 Aug 2026] Title:Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice View a PDF of the paper titled Whose do…
AI 服務暫時不可用,以下為來源正文,待恢復後補全翻譯。
--> [Submitted on 14 Aug 2026] Title:Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice View a PDF of the paper titled Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice, by Syeda Anshrah Gillani and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Patients increasingly ask large language model (LLM) assistants which doctor to see, making these systems AI infomediaries: algorithms that intermediate one person's choice among other people and thereby decide, silently and at scale, which physicians become visible. We report a prespecified randomized algorithm audit of what causally moves those recommendations. Seven models (six open-weight; gpt-4o-mini) each chose among five synthetic family-medicine physician cards whose attributes were independently randomized across 3,024 choice sets, three patient personas, nine prompt paraphrases and nine experimental arms, yielding 40,068 scored responses; gender and ethnicity were signaled through names following correspondence-audit methodology. Reputation signals dominate: raising a rating from 3.9 to 4.7 increases choice probability by 31.4 percentage points (pp), and raising the fee from $90 to $190 lowers it by 20.0 pp. Demographic parity is rejected, but not in the direction human audit studies predict: female-signaled names gain 2.5 pp, and Hispanic-, South-Asian- and Black-signaled names gain 1.3-2.9 pp over White-signaled names, tilts worth $7-$14 per visit in fee-equivalent terms, and a content-free first-listed position is worth $11. Yet models mentioned gender or ethnicity in at most 0.03% of their stated reasons and abstained in 0.39% of trials, so these effects are invisible in the models' own explanations, and transparency obligations relying on model self-report would not detect them. One reasoning model failed the prespecified auditability gate outright. The frozen design makes the audit repeatable: any new model can be assessed against identical stimuli, making recurring behavioural audit, rather than self-reported explanation, the monitoring technology fit for purpose. Comments: 26 pages, 9 figures, 10 tables Subjects: Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14399 [cs.CY] (or arXiv:2608.14399v1 [cs.CY] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14399 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration) Submission history From: Mirza Samad Ahmed Baig [view email] [v1] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 15:39:10 UTC (86 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice, by Syeda Anshrah Gillani and 1 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CY new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI cs.CL References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar Loading... Data provided by: Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)